green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Monroe v. Rockland County District Attorney's Office
See Sossamon, 131 S. Ct. at 1663; Washington, 731 F.3d at 145 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Lindo v. NCL (Bahamas), Ltd.
(2×)
Dredging Co., 355 U.S. 426, 432 , 78 S.Ct. 394 , 2 L.Ed.2d 382 (1958), in order to assuage their hazardous "exposure to the perils of the sea." Chandris, Inc. v. Latsis, 515 U.S. 347, 354 , 115 S.Ct. 2172 , 132 L.Ed.2d 314 (1995) (citation and quotation marks omitted); accord Crimson Yachts v. Betty Lyn II Motor Yacht, 603 F.3d 864 , 874 n. 5 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 178 , 178 L.Ed.2d 41 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Susi
(2×)
See, e.g., Ahu Ali, 528 F.3d at 260-61 (applying the usual Gall analysis when considering the Government’s cross-appeal challenging the substantive reasonableness of a below-Guidelines term of imprisonment); see also United States v. Engle, 592 F.3d 495 (4th Cir.), cert. denied - U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 165 , 178 L.Ed.2d 41 (2010), (apply *290 ing no presumption when considering the substantive reasonableness of a sentence of probation when the Guidelines included a term of imprisonment).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
David Critzer, et ux.
v.
City of Cupertino, California
v.
City of Cupertino, California
No. 09-1508.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 2010.
178 L. Ed. 2d 41
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District, denied.