green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
12.5 score
“a person who buys dmv records in bulk does so for the purpose of making permissible actual use of information therein under , even if that person does 286 not actually use every single item of information therein”
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Norma Wiles v. Ascom Transport System, Inc.
a person who buys dmv records in bulk does so for the purpose of making permissible actual use of information therein under , even if that person does 286 not actually use every single item of information therein
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Howard v. CRIMINAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
a person who buys dmv records in bulk does so for the purpose of making permissible actual use of information therein under , even if that person does not actually use every single item of information therein.
discussed
Cited "see"
Barone v. Chapman-Cleland
Those contentions are without merit. “[T]he Court of Appeals has recently reiterated that a nonbiological, nonadoptive parent does not have standing to seek visitation when a biological parent who is fit opposes it, and that equitable estoppel does not apply in such situations even where the nonparent has enjoyed a close relationship with the child and exercised some control over the child with the parent’s consent” (Matter of Palmatier v Dane, 97 AD3d 864, 865 [2012]; see Debra H. v Janice R., 14 NY3d 576, 589-597 [2010], rearg denied 15 NY3d 767 [2010], cert denied 562 US 1136 [2011]; …
discussed
Cited "see"
Barone v. Chapman-Cleland
Those contentions are without merit. “[T]he Court of Appeals has recently reiterated that a nonbiological, nonadoptive parent does not have standing to seek visitation when a biological parent who is fit opposes it, and that equitable estoppel does not apply in such situations even where the nonparent has enjoyed a close relationship with the child and exercised some control over the child with the parent’s consent” (Matter of Palmatier v Dane, 97 AD3d 864, 865 [2012]; see Debra H. v Janice R., 14 NY3d 576, 589-597 [2010], rearg denied 15 NY3d 767 [2010], cert denied 562 US 1136 [2011]; …
discussed
Cited "see"
BARONE, BROOKE S. v. CHAPMAN-CLELAND, ELIZABETH A.
Those contentions are without merit. “[T]he Court of Appeals has recently reiterated that a nonbiological, nonadoptive parent does not have standing to seek visitation when a biological parent who is fit -2- 416 CAF 14-01034 opposes it, and that equitable estoppel does not apply in such situations even where the nonparent has enjoyed a close relationship with the child and exercised some control over the child with the parent’s consent” (Matter of Palmatier v Dane, 97 AD3d 864, 865 ; see Debra H. v Janice R., 14 NY3d 576, 589-597 , rearg denied 15 NY3d 767 , cert denied ___ US ___, 131 S…
discussed
Cited "see"
White v. Wilcox
We reject that contention. “[T]he Court of Appeals has recently reiterated that a nonbiological, nonadoptive parent does not have standing to seek visitation when a biological parent who is fit opposes it, and that equitable estoppel does not apply in such situations even where the nonparent has enjoyed a close relationship with the child and exercised some control over the child with the parent’s consent” (Matter of Palmatier v Dane, 97 AD3d 864, 865 [2012]; see Debra H. v Janice R., 14 NY3d 576, 589-597 [2010], rearg denied 15 NY3d 767 [2010], cert denied 562 US —, 131 S Ct 908 [2011…
discussed
Cited "see"
White v. Wilcox
We reject that contention. “[T]he Court of Appeals has recently reiterated that a nonbiological, nonadoptive parent does not have standing to seek visitation when a biological parent who is fit opposes it, and that equitable estoppel does not apply in such situations even where the nonparent has enjoyed a close relationship with the child and exercised some control over the child with the parent’s consent” (Matter of Palmatier v Dane, 97 AD3d 864, 865 [2012]; see Debra H. v Janice R., 14 NY3d 576, 589-597 [2010], rearg denied 15 NY3d 767 [2010], cert denied 562 US —, 131 S Ct 908 [2011…
discussed
Cited "see"
WHITE, JR., RICHARD W. v. WILCOX, AMANDA
We reject that contention. “[T]he Court of Appeals has recently reiterated that a nonbiological, nonadoptive parent does not have standing to seek visitation when a biological parent who is fit opposes it, and that equitable estoppel does not apply in such situations even where the nonparent has enjoyed a close relationship with the child and exercised some control over the child with the parent’s consent” (Matter of Palmatier v Dane, 97 AD3d 864, 865 ; see Debra H. v Janice R., 14 NY3d 576, 589-597 , rearg denied 15 NY3d 767 , cert denied ___ US ___, 131 S Ct 908 ; Matter of Alison D. v…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Kelly G. v. Circe H.
Domestic Relations Law § 237(b), which is a statutory exception to the general rule that each party is responsible for her own legal fees ( see Hooper Assoc., Ltd. v AGS Computers, 74 NY2d 487, 491 [1989]), provides, in relevant part, that "upon any application . . . concerning custody, visitation or maintenance of a child, the court may direct a spouse or parent to pay counsel fees and fees and expenses of experts directly to the attorney of the other spouse or parent to enable the other party to carry on or defend the application or proceeding by the other spouse or parent as, in the court'…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dickerson v. Thompson
Notably, plaintiffs unaltered status as a partner to the civil union may even vest certain legal rights in defendant with respect to any child that plaintiff may subsequently bear (see Miller-Jenkins v Miller-Jenkins, 180 Vt 441, 912 A2d 951 [2006], cert denied 550 US 918 [2007] [holding that a child born by artificial insemination during a valid legal civil union to one partner of a civil union will be deemed the other partner’s child under Vermont law for purposes of determining custodial rights following dissolution of the civil union]; see also Debra H. v Janice R., 14 NY3d 576, 598-599 …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Janice R.
v.
Debra H.
v.
Debra H.
No. 10-441.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 2011.
178 L. Ed. 2d 749
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1) · Ninth Circuit (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.
Same case below, 14 N.Y.3d 576, 904 N.Y.S.2d 263, 930 N.E.2d 184.