Freeman v. Quicken Loans, Inc., 181 L. Ed. 2d 254 (SCOTUS 2011). · Go Syfert
Freeman v. Quicken Loans, Inc., 181 L. Ed. 2d 254 (SCOTUS 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Arnold & Itkin, L.L.P., Beck Redden LLP, Albritton Law Firm, Kurt Arnold, Cory Itkin, Jason Itkin, Russell Post, Fields Alexander, Jas Brar and Eric Albritton v. Maria Santos Lopez Dominguez, Individually and as Next Friend of Karen Marien Andrade Lopez (texapp, 2015-12-03)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" Arnold & Itkin, L.L.P., Beck Redden LLP, Albritton Law Firm, Kurt Arnold, Cory Itkin, Jason Itkin, Russell Post, Fields Alexander, Jas Brar and Eric Albritton v. Maria Santos Lopez Dominguez, Individually and as Next Friend of Karen Marien Andrade Lopez
Tex. App. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rocha v. Thaler, 619 F.3d 387, 399-400 (5th Cir. 2010), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 397 (2011).
cited Cited "see" Lance James v. Burl Cain, Warden
5th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rocha v. Thaler, 619 F.3d 387, 393 (5th Cir.2010), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 397 , 181 L.Ed.2d 255 (2011).
cited Cited "see" Molosky v. Washington Mutual, Inc.
6th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Freeman v. Quicken Loans, Inc., 626 F.3d 799 (5th Cir.2010), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 397 , 181 L.Ed.2d 254 (2011).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lapointe v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. · 2015 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Furthermore, notwithstanding the third habeas court’s ruling, we have little doubt that the petitioner’s counsel will make effective use of the recording at a new trial, if the state elects to retry the petitioner, both to impeach Morrissey’s credibility and to bolster the petitioner’s claim that the burn time estimates provided by DeHaan and Kelder prove that it was temporally impossible for the petitioner to have committed the crimes of which he was convicted because the testimony of DeHaan, Kelder and Martin provides him with a complete and compelling alibi. 86 For present purposes,…
Tammy Foret Freeman, et vir
v.
Quicken Loans, Inc.
No. 10-1042.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 2011.
181 L. Ed. 2d 254
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted.

[*255] Same case below, 626 F.3d 799.