green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
26.0 score
“in the absence of some distinguishing differences between the successive events, there is no reason to fear that the jury will pick and choose among the alleged incidents and convict the defendant while disagreeing as to which of them were committed”
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012
2019
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. David J. Terilli.
in the absence of some distinguishing differences between the successive events, there is no reason to fear that the jury will pick and choose among the alleged incidents and convict the defendant while disagreeing as to which of them were committed
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Dones
an adjudication of a juvenile as a youthful offender . . . does not transform illegal act from an act of delinquency into a crime
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Edward Harold Schad v. Charles L. Ryan
Schad then attempted to raise Martinez once more in a petition for certiorari, but the Supreme Court denied review, Schad v. Ryan, 133 S. Ct. 432, 432 (2012), and he unsuccessfully argued the Martinez IAC claim again on his motion for rehearing, Schad v. Ryan, 133 S. Ct. 922 , 922 (2013).2 Bereft of any legally significant change of 2 In his petition for certiorari, which was filed the same day that the panel denied his Motion to Vacate and Remand, Schad relied on Martinez extensively and specifically invoked his motion before the panel raising the same arguments, noting that the panel had not…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Edward Harold Schad v. Charles L. Ryan
Schad then attempted to raise Martinez once more in a petition for certiorari, but the Supreme Court denied review, Schad v. Ryan, 133 S. Ct. 432, 432 (2012), and he unsuccessfully argued the Martinez IAC claim again on his motion for rehearing, Schad v. Ryan, 133 S. Ct. 922 , 922 (2013).2 Bereft of any legally significant 2 In his petition for certiorari, which was filed the same day that the panel denied his Motion to Vacate and Remand, Schad relied on Martinez extensively and specifically invoked his motion before the panel raising the same arguments, noting that the panel had not yet “ac…
discussed
Cited "see"
Agostini v. Commonwealth
See Commonwealth v. Santos, 440 Mass. 281, 291 (2003), overruled on other grounds by Commonwealth v. Anderson, 461 10 Mass. 616 , cert. denied, 568 U.S. 946 (2012) (noting that "snatching" can constitute sufficient "force" to transform crime into robbery).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Devaughn Johnson.
See Commonwealth v. Santos, 440 Mass. 281, 285-286 (2003) (unanimity instruction not required as to factual scenario for armed robbery), overruled on other grounds by Commonwealth v. Anderson, 461 Mass. 616 , cert. denied, 568 U.S. 946 (2012). 6 The panelists are listed in order of seniority. 12
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Mohamed Mohamed.
See Commonwealth v. Anderson, 461 Mass. 616, 621 , cert. denied, 568 U.S. 946 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Tillson
See Commonwealth v. Santos, 440 Mass. 281, 289 (2003), overruled on other grounds by Commonwealth v. Anderson, 461 Mass. 616, 633 , cert. denied, 568 U.S. 946 (2012); 15 Commonwealth v. Inoa, 97 Mass. App. Ct. 262 , 264 (2020); Commonwealth v. Oquendo, 83 Mass. App. Ct. 190, 193-194 (2013).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Gibson
See id., quoting Commonwealth v. Vick, 454 Mass. 418, 431 (2009) ("elements-based 32 approach remains the standard for determining whether multiple convictions stemming from one criminal transaction are duplicative").
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Manha
See Commonwealth v. Anderson , 461 Mass. 616 , 624, 963 N.E.2d 704 , cert. denied, 568 U.S. 946 , 133 S.Ct. 433 , 184 L.Ed.2d 265 (2012).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Samuel S., a juvenile
See Commonwealth v. Anderson, 461 Mass. 616, 630 , cert. denied, 568 U.S. 946 (2012) (youthful offenders “not exclude[d] . . . from the dictates of § 53”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles Hedlund v. Charles Ryan
(2×)
See Schad v. Ryan, 671 F.3d 708 , 723 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam), cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 432 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see"
James McKinney v. Charles Ryan
(2×)
See Schad v. Ryan, 671 F.3d 708 , 723 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam), cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 432 (2012).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Njuguna
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Santos, 440 Mass. 281, 292-294 (2003), overruled on other grounds by Commonwealth v. Anderson, 461 Mass. 616, 633-634 , cert. denied, 568 U.S. 946 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Barreto
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Anderson , 461 Mass. 616 , 623, 963 N.E.2d 704 , cert. denied, 568 U.S. 946 , 133 S.Ct. 433 , 184 L.Ed.2d 265 (2012) ("Where the caller is anonymous, there are at least two ways to establish the caller's reliability.
Francois
v.
New York
v.
New York
No. 12-5541.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 2012.
App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.