Lomax v. United States, 568 U.S. 1112 (2013). · Go Syfert
Search
Lomax v. United States, 568 U.S. 1112 (2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the participle including typically indicates a partial list.”
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Michael Musacchio (ca5, 2014-11-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Michael Musacchio
5th Cir. · 2014 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the participle including typically indicates a partial list.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bishop v. Smith (2×)
10th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Ramos, 695 F.3d 1035, 1046 (10th Cir.2012), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 912 , 184 L.Ed.2d 701 (2013); Columbian Fin.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Bishop v. Smith
10th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Ramos, 695 F.3d 1035, 1046 (10th Cir. 2012), cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 912 (2013); Columbian Fin.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lomax
v.
United States
No. 12-7493.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 2013.
568 U.S. 1112
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 84%
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.