green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2015
2020
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
American Civil Liberties Union Fund v. Livingston County
This is because the public’s interest and any potential harm to the parties or others “largely depend on the constitutionality of the [state action].” Id. (quoting Hamilton’s Bogarts, 501 F.3d at 649 ); see Liberty Coins, LLC v. Goodman, 748 F.3d 682, 689 (6th Cir.2014), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 950 , 190 L.Ed.2d 831 (2015) (“[W]hen a party seeks a preliminary injunction on the basis of a potential constitutional violation, ‘the likelihood of success on the merits often will be the determinative factor.’ ” (quoting Obama for America v. Husted, 697 F.3d 423, 436 (6th …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chong Yim v. City of Seattle
Instead, a law regulating the use of property violates substantive due process only if it "fails to serve any legitimate governmental objective," making it "arbitrary or irrational." Chevron U.S.A., 544 U.S. at 542 ; see also Kentner v. City ofSanibel, 750 F.3d 1274, 1280-81 (11th Cir. 2014), cert, denied, 135 S. Ct. 950 (2015); Samson v. City ofBainbridge Island, 683 F.3d 1051, 1058 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 568 U.S. 1041 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chong Yim v. City of Seattle
Therefore, a law regulating the use of property violates substantive due process only if it "fails to serve any legitimate governmental objective," making it "arbitrary or irrational." Chevron U.S.A., 544 U.S. at 542 ; see also Kentner v. City ofSanibel, 750 F.3d 1274, 1280-81 (11th Cir. 2014), cert, denied, 135 S. Ct. 950 (2015); Samson v. City ofBainbridge Island, 683 F.3d 1051, 1058 (9th dr.), cert, denied, 568 U.S. 1041 (2012).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Samuel M. PIATNITSKY
v.
WASHINGTON.
v.
WASHINGTON.
No. 14–6565..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 2015.
135 S. Ct. 950
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington denied.