Cox Commc'ns, Inc. v. Sprint Commc'n Co., 137 S. Ct. 2267 (2017). · Go Syfert
Cox Commc'ns, Inc. v. Sprint Commc'n Co., 137 S. Ct. 2267 (2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: McCloud v. Save-A-Lot Knoxville, LLC (tned, 2019-05-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) McCloud v. Save-A-Lot Knoxville, LLC
E.D. Tenn. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
we think it beyond debate that a consumer has a concrete interest in preventing his identity from actually being stolen
examined Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Raul Mercado-Moreno
9th Cir. · 2017 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
if the original sentencing court failed to make a specific drug-quantity calculation, the resentencing court may have to make its own quantity finding in order to determine the defendant's guideline range.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Luis Areyanes
4th Cir. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Peters, 843 F.3d 572, 577 (4th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 2267 (2017) (stating standard of review).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
v.
SPRINT COMMUNICATION COMPANY LP
No. 16–1106..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 19, 2017.
137 S. Ct. 2267

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.