Moore v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 314 (2017). · Go Syfert
Search
Moore v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 314 (2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: v. Glam and Glits Nail Design, Inc. (casd, 2021-06-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" v. Glam and Glits Nail Design, Inc.
S.D. Cal. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
This violation occurs “when the person has not received permission 19 to use the computer for any purpose (such as when a hacker accesses someone’s 20 computer without any permission), or when the employer has rescinded permission to 21 access the computer and the defendant uses the computer anyway.” Facebook, Inc. v. 22 Power Ventures, Inc., 844 F.3d 1058, 1066 (9th Cir. 2016) (citing LVRC Holdings LLC v. 23 Brekka, 581 F.3d 1127, 1135 (9th Cir. 2009)), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 313 (2017); see 24 also United States v. Nosal (“Nosal II”), 844 F.3d 1024, 1029 (9th Cir. 2016), cert. 25…
discussed Cited "see" NW Monitoring LLC v. Hollander
W.D. Wash. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Nosal, 844 F.3d 1024, 1042 (9th Cir. 2016) cert. 18 denied, 138 S. Ct. 314 (2017)) (noting that the manner in which the information was compiled 19 or the selection of information to retain could turn public information into a proprietary trade 20 secret) (“Nosal II”).
cited Cited "see" State v. Russell
Neb. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Luria v. ADP, Inc. (In re Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortg. Corp.)
Bankr. M.D. Fla. · 2018 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Ivey v. First Citizens Bank & Trust (In re Whitley), 848 F.3d 205 , 210 (4th Cir. 2017), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 314 , 199 L.Ed.2d 207 (2017).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Furr v. TD Bank, N.A. (In re Rollaguard Sec., LLC)
Bankr. S.D. Florida · 2018 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g. , Ivey v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. (In re Whitley) , 848 F.3d 205 , 208-10 (4th Cir. 2017), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 314 , 199 L.Ed.2d 207 (2017) (holding that "when a debtor deposits or receives a wire transfer of funds into his own unrestricted checking account in the regular course of business, he has not transferred those funds to the bank that operates the account [because] the debtor is still free to access those funds at will"); In re Prescott , 805 F.2d 719 , 729 (7th Cir. 1986) (holding that "to the extent a deposit is made into an unrestricted checking…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Decornick MOORE
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 16–8973..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 2017.
138 S. Ct. 314
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.