green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.1 score
“here is authority for the proposition that even after the statutory period for moving to vacate an award has expired, a party may use the statutory grounds for vacation in defense of a motion to confirm”
Treatment trajectory · 1934 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1934
1980
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Warren v. Geller
here is authority for the proposition that even after the statutory period for moving to vacate an award has expired, a party may use the statutory grounds for vacation in defense of a motion to confirm
discussed
Cited "see"
In re the Arbitration between Michaels & Mariforum Shipping, S.A.
See The Hart-bridge, 57 F.2d 672, 673 (2d Cir. 1932) (per curiam), cert. denied, Munson Steamship Line v. North of England Steamship Co., 288 U.S. 601 , 53 S.Ct. 320 , 77 L.Ed. 977 (1933); Island Territory of Curacao v. Solitron Devices, 356 F.Supp. 1, 11-12 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 489 F.2d 1313 (2d Cir. 1973); Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority v. Star Lines Ltd., 454 F.Supp. 368 , 372 & n. 6 (S.D.N.Y.1978). .
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Matter of the Arbitration Between E. B. Michaels and Ralph Michaels, on Their Own Behalf and as Agents for the Former Shareholders of Hyman-Michaels Company, Charterer, and Mariforum Shipping, S.A., Owners of the M/v Leslie Under a Time Charter Party Dated April 9, 1974
See The Hartbridge, 57 F.2d 672, 673 (2d Cir. 1932) (per curiam), cert. denied, Munson Steamship Line v. North of England Steamship Co., 288 U.S. 601 , 53 S.Ct. 320 , 77 L.Ed. 977 (1933); Island Territory of Curacao v. Solitron Devices, 356 F.Supp. 1, 11-12 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 489 F.2d 1313 (2d Cir. 1973); Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority v. Star Lines Ltd., 454 F.Supp. 368 , 372 & n. 6 (S.D.N.Y.1978) 4 Similarly, it is well established that a district court cannot entertain an attack upon the qualifications or partiality of arbitrators until after the conclusion of the arbitration and t…
cited
Cited "see"
Shannon v. Chambers
See Hurn v. Oursler, 289 U.S. 238 , 53 S.Ct. 319 , 77 L.Ed. 972 (1933); 36 C.J.S.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sales Affiliates, Inc. v. Hutzler Bros.
See United Chromium, Inc., v. International Silver Co., 2 Cir., 60 F.2d 913 , certiorari denied 288 U.S. 600 , 53 S.Ct. 319 , 77 L.Ed. 976 . (b) Prior Art Disclosures Turning now to the prior art, defendants, in attacking the validity of the patent, rely upon five prior patents and two published articles, as follows: Patent No. 1,379,855 to Joseph Donner, issued May 31, 1921; patent No. 1,899,707 to Ralph H.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Photopaint Technologies, LLC v. Smartlens Corp.
See also The Hartbridge, 57 F.2d 672, 673 (2d Cir.1932), cert. denied, Munson Steamship Line v. North England Steamship Co., 288 U.S. 601 , 53 S.Ct. 320 , 77 L.Ed. 977 (1933) (referring to a party’s right to move for the confirmation of an arbitration award under § 9 as a “privilege”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lawson
v.
Whitlock Cordage Co.
v.
Whitlock Cordage Co.
No. 566.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 23, 1933.
Mr. W. Hastings Swenarton for petitioner. Messrs. Wm. Houston Kenyon and Theodore S. Kenyon for respondent.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Louisiana (1)
..Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.