Dr. Bloom Dentist Inc. v. Cruise, 288 U.S. 588 (1933). · Go Syfert
Search
Dr. Bloom Dentist Inc. v. Cruise, 288 U.S. 588 (1933). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · "[t]here is authority for the proposition that even after the statutory period for moving to vacate an award has expired, a party may use the statutory grounds for vacation in defense of a motion to confirm"
29 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Warren v. Geller (laed, 2019-05-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1949 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1949 1987 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Warren v. Geller
E.D. La. · 2019 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
here is authority for the proposition that even after the statutory period for moving to vacate an award has expired, a party may use the statutory grounds for vacation in defense of a motion to confirm
discussed Cited "see" In re the Arbitration between Michaels & Mariforum Shipping, S.A.
2d Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See The Hart-bridge, 57 F.2d 672, 673 (2d Cir. 1932) (per curiam), cert. denied, Munson Steamship Line v. North of England Steamship Co., 288 U.S. 601 , 53 S.Ct. 320 , 77 L.Ed. 977 (1933); Island Territory of Curacao v. Solitron Devices, 356 F.Supp. 1, 11-12 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 489 F.2d 1313 (2d Cir. 1973); Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority v. Star Lines Ltd., 454 F.Supp. 368 , 372 & n. 6 (S.D.N.Y.1978). .
discussed Cited "see" In the Matter of the Arbitration Between E. B. Michaels and Ralph Michaels, on Their Own Behalf and as Agents for the Former Shareholders of Hyman-Michaels Company, Charterer, and Mariforum Shipping, S.A., Owners of the M/v Leslie Under a Time Charter Party Dated April 9, 1974
2d Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See The Hartbridge, 57 F.2d 672, 673 (2d Cir. 1932) (per curiam), cert. denied, Munson Steamship Line v. North of England Steamship Co., 288 U.S. 601 , 53 S.Ct. 320 , 77 L.Ed. 977 (1933); Island Territory of Curacao v. Solitron Devices, 356 F.Supp. 1, 11-12 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 489 F.2d 1313 (2d Cir. 1973); Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority v. Star Lines Ltd., 454 F.Supp. 368 , 372 & n. 6 (S.D.N.Y.1978) 4 Similarly, it is well established that a district court cannot entertain an attack upon the qualifications or partiality of arbitrators until after the conclusion of the arbitration and t…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Photopaint Technologies, LLC v. Smartlens Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also The Hartbridge, 57 F.2d 672, 673 (2d Cir.1932), cert. denied, Munson Steamship Line v. North England Steamship Co., 288 U.S. 601 , 53 S.Ct. 320 , 77 L.Ed. 977 (1933) (referring to a party’s right to move for the confirmation of an arbitration award under § 9 as a “privilege”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dr. Bloom Dentist Inc.
v.
Cruise, City Clerk
No. 588.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 23, 1933.
288 U.S. 588
Mr. Thomas G. Frost for appellant. Messrs. Arthur J. W. Hilly and J. Joseph Lilly for appellee.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 58%
Citer courts: E.D. Louisiana (1)

Appeal from the Supreme Court of New York.

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U. S. 114; Douglas v. Noble, 261 U. S. 165; Missouri ex rel. Hurwitz v. North, 271 U. S. 40, 43; Graves v. Minnesota, 272 U. S. 425, 428; Lambert v. Yellowley, 272 U. S. 581, 596; People v. Painless Parker Dentist, 85 Colo. 304, 280 U. S. 566; Miller v. State Board of Dental Examiners, 90 Colo. 193; 8 P. (2d) 699; 287 U. S. 563.