Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Abraham & Straus, Inc., 293 U.S. 596 (1934). · Go Syfert
Search
Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Abraham & Straus, Inc., 293 U.S. 596 (1934). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Buchwald v. Renco Group, Inc. (In Re Magnesium Corp.) (nysb, 2009-01-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1937 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1937 1981 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Buchwald v. Renco Group, Inc. (In Re Magnesium Corp.)
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Art Metal Works v. Abraham & Straus, 70 F.2d 641, 646 (2d Cir.1934) (L.Hand, dissenting), cert. denied, 293 U.S. *765 596, 55 S.Ct. 110 , 79 L.Ed. 689 (1934), dissent adopted as opinion of the court on rehearing, 107 F.2d 944 (2d Cir.1939) (per curiam), cert. denied, 308 U.S. 621 , 60 S.Ct. 293 , 84 L.Ed. 518 (1939) ("Art Metal Works") ("Whenever the question has come up, it has been held that immoral conduct to be relevant, must touch and taint the plaintiff personally.”) (emphasis added).
discussed Cited "see" Adelphia Communications Corp. v. Bank of America, N.A. (In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.)
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Art Metal Works v. Abraham & Straus, 70 F.2d 641, 646 (2d Cir.1934) (L.Hand, dissenting), cer t. denied, 293 U.S. 596 , 55 S.Ct. 110 , 79 L.Ed. 689 (1934), dissent adopted as opinion of the court on rehearing, 107 F.2d 944 (2d Cir.1939) (per curiam), cert. denied, 308 U.S. 621 , 60 S.Ct. 293 , 84 L.Ed. 518 (1939) ("Art Metal Works”) ("Whenever the question has come up, it has been held that immoral conduct to be relevant, must touch and taint the plaintiff personally. ”) (emphasis added). 79 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Person v. Association of Bar of City of New York
E.D.N.Y · 1976 · signal: see also · confidence low
A claim is insubstantial only if “ ‘its unsoundness so clearly results from the previous decisions of this court as to foreclose the subject and leave no room for the inference that the questions sought to be raised can be the subject of controversy.’ ” Ex parte Poresky, supra, at 32 [ 54 S.Ct. 3,4 ] quoting from Hannis Distilling Co. v. Baltimore, supra, at 288 [ 30 S.Ct. 326 ]; see also Levering & Garriques Co. v. Morrin, 289 U.S. 103, 105-106 [ 55 S.Ct. 110 , 79 L.Ed. 688 ] (1933); McGilvra v. Ross, 215 U.S. 70, 80 [ 30 S.Ct. 27 , 54 L.Ed. 95 ] (1909).’ Goosby v. Osser, 409 U.S. 5…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Art Metal Works, Inc.
v.
Abraham & Straus, Inc.
No. 318.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1934.
293 U.S. 596
Messrs. Martin W. Littleton, Joseph Lorenz, and Kenneth S. Neal for petitioner. Mr. Robert S. Blair for respondent.
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.