Carbo-Frost, Inc. v. Pure Carbonic, Inc., 308 U.S. 569 (1939). · Go Syfert
Search
Carbo-Frost, Inc. v. Pure Carbonic, Inc., 308 U.S. 569 (1939). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
45 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: King v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services (dc, 1999-12-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1941 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1941 1983 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" King v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
D.C. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Railco, 564 A.2d at 1172 -78 (quoting, inter alia, Judge Learned Hand’s observation in Grain Handling Co. v. Sweeney, 102 F.2d 464, 466 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 308 U.S. 570 , 60 S.Ct. 83 , 84 L.Ed. 478 (1939), that the LHWCA “is not concerned with pathology, but with industrial disability; and a disease is no disease until it manifests itself.”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Donald Leblanc v. Cooper/t. Smith Stevedoring, Inc.
5th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
The Fifth Circuit established this precedent early in McNeelly , noting that an occupational disease is “one usually or frequently contracted by workers in [a particular] occupation.” Id. at 957 ; see also Grain Handling Co. v. Sweeney, 102 F.2d 464, 465 (2d Cir.) (“[Coverage must be limited to diseases resulting from working conditions particular to the calling.”), cert. denied, 308 U.S. 570 , 60 S.Ct. 83 , 84 L.Ed. 478 (1939).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Zallea Brothers v. Cooper
Del. Super. Ct. · 1960 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Grain Handling Co., Inc. et al. v. Sweeney, et al., 1939, 102 F. 2d 464 , certiorari denied 308 U. S. 570 , 60 S. Ct. 83 , 84 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Donald LeBLANC v. COOPER/T. SMITH STEVEDORING, INC., et al
unknown court · signal: see also · confidence low
The Fifth Circuit established this precedent early in McNeelly, noting that an occupational disease is "one usually or frequently contracted by workers in [a particular] occupation." Id. at 957 ; see also Grain Handling Co. v. Sweeney, 102 F.2d 464, 465 (2d Cir.) ("[C]overage must be limited to diseases resulting from working conditions particular to the calling."), cert. denied, 308 U.S. 570 , 60 S.Ct. 83 , 84 L.Ed. 478 (1939).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carbo-Frost, Inc.
v.
Pure Carbonic, Inc.
No. 115.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1939.
308 U.S. 569
Messrs. Paul R. Stinson, Arthur Mag, and Roy B. Thomson for petitioner. Messrs. Sanford H. E. Freund and Samuel W. Sawyer for respondents.
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.