green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1946 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1946
1986
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Melillo
See Newman v. State, 148 Tex.Cr.R. 645, 651-652 , 187 S.W.2d 559, 562-563 , cert. denied, 326 U.S. 776 , 66 S.Ct. 174 , 90 L.Ed. 466 (1945) (“the position this Court occupies in relation to such eases is both unique and difficult * * *.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Taylor Thompson, William Edward Tanner and James Benjamin Campbell
See McGunnigal v. United States, 151 F.2d 162 (C.A. 1, 1945), cert. denied, 326 U.S. 776 , 66 S.Ct. 267 , 90 L.Ed. 469 (1945).” 306 F.2d at 531 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Francis L. Harney, Jr. v. United States of America, Charles H. Lawton, Jr. v. United States of America, James S. O'COnnell v. United States
See McGunnigal v. United States, 151 F.2d 162 (C.A.1, 1945), cert. denied, 326 U.S. 776 , 66 S.Ct. 267 , 90 L.Ed. 469 (1945). *532 We come now to the question whether extensive adverse publicity deprived the appellants of a fair trial or at least required the court below in the sound exercise of its discretion to grant a continuance. 4 No doubt extensive publicity attended the investigations by the FBI and the Blatnik Committee of the scandals attendant upon the taking of lands in Massachusetts for federally aided highway purposes.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence A. Crisafi and Frank Guglielmini
United States v. Boyer, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 202 , 150 F.2d 595, 596 , 166 A.L.R. 209 (1945); see Mas v. United States, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 223 , 151 F.2d 32 (1945), cert. denied, 326 U.S. 776 , 66 S. Ct. 267 , 90 L.Ed. 469 ; Dryden v. United States, 237 F.2d 517 (5 Cir. 1956); McCormick on Evidence § 43 (1954).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Woll
See McGunnigal v. United States, 1 Cir., 1945, 151 F.2d 162 , certiorari denied 326 U.S. 776 , 66 S.Ct. 267 , 90 L.Ed. 469 .
Mas
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 534.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 10, 1945.
Mr. P. Bateman Ennis for petitioner., Solicitor General Mc-Grath, Messrs. Robert S. Erdahl and Laurence A. Knapp for the United States.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.