green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Tv 9, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Mid-Florida Televisioncorporation, Intervenor. Comint Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Tv 9, Inc. And Mid-Floridatelevision Corporation, Intervenors. Central Nine Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Tv 9, Inc. And Mid-Floridatelevision Corporation, Intervenors. Florida Heartland Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Tv 9, Inc. And Mid-Floridatelevision Corporation, Intervenors
Also, the Commission elsewhere stated, 'Simply stated, the fundamental purpose of this facet of the multiple ownership rules is to promote diversification of ownership in order to maximize diversification of program and service viewpoints as well as to prevent any undue concentration of economic power contrary to the public interest.' Rules and Regulations Relating to Multiple Ownership of Standard, FM, and Television Broadcast Stations, 18 F.C.C. 288 , 291 (1953); accord, Rules and Regulations Relating to Multiple Ownership of Standard, FM, and Television Broadcast Stations, 22 F.C.C.2d 306 ,…
cited
Cited "see"
Grogan v. DeSapio
See State v. Mundet Cork Corp., 8 N. J. 359, 369 (1952), certiorari denied 344 U. S. 819 , 73 S. Ct. 14 , 97 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Roles
v.
Earle, Collector of Internal Revenue
v.
Earle, Collector of Internal Revenue
No. 72.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1952.
Thomas L. Catch and David Pattullo for petitioner., Solicitor General Perlman, Acting Assistant Attorney General Slack, A. F. Prescott and Carlton Fox for respondents.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.