green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Mass v. Braswell Motor Freight Lines, Inc.
“The propriety of a broad order depends upon the specific circumstances of the case . . . .” Colgate, 380 U.S. at 394 , 85 S.Ct. at 1048 ; see Feitler v. FTC, 201 F.2d 790, 794 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 814 , 74 S.Ct. 24 , 98 L.Ed. 341 (1953).
discussed
Cited "see"
Standard Oil Company of California v. Federal Trade Commission, Batten, Barton, Durstine & Osborn, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
"The propriety of a broad order depends upon the specific circumstances of the case . . . ." Colgate, 380 U.S. at 394 , 85 S.Ct. at 1048 ; see Feitler v. FTC, 201 F.2d 790, 794 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 814 , 74 S.Ct. 24 , 98 L.Ed. 341 (1953).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Swinerton, doing business as Swinerton & Walberg Co.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 72.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1953.
Gardiner Johnson for petitioners. Acting Solicitor General Stern, George J. Bott, David P. Findling, Dominick L. Manoli and Elizabeth Weston for respondent. Briefs of amici curiae supporting petitioners were filed by William E. Leahy, William J. Hughes, Jr. and Cornelius B. Gray for the Building & Construction Trades Department of the American Federation of Labor; and by Lewis T. Gardiner for the National Constructors Association.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.