O'Neill v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R., 348 U.S. 956 (1955). · Go Syfert
Search
O'Neill v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R., 348 U.S. 956 (1955). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
69 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 22 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Schneider (paed, 2011-09-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955 1990 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Schneider
E.D. Pa. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Becker v. United States, 348 U.S. 957 , 75 S.Ct. 449 , 99 L.Ed. 747 (1955).
discussed Cited "see" Federal Deposit Insurance v. Cuvrell (In Re F & T Contractors, Inc.)
Bankr. E.D. Mich. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Coffman v. Cobra Manufacturing Company, 214 F.2d 489 (9th Cir. 1954), cert. den., 348 U.S. 912 , 75 S.Ct. 291 , 99 L.Ed. 715 , reh. den., 348 U.S. 956 , 75 S.Ct. 436 , 99 L.Ed. 747 ; Baker v. National City Bank of Cleveland, 387 F.Supp. 1137 (N.D.Ohio 1974), aff’d. 511 F.2d 1016 (6th Cir. 1975). 10 The jurisdiction of the bankruptcy courts was the subject of much debate and litigation under the Bankruptcy Act.
discussed Cited "see" W. O. Bedal v. The Hallack and Howard Lumber Company, a Corporation, and W. O. Bedal v. Oregon Short Line Railroad Company, a Corporation, and Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation
9th Cir. · 1955 · signal: see · confidence high
See O'Neill v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co., 348 U.S. 956 , 75 S.Ct. 447 , apparently approving the dissenting opinion in Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. O'Neill, 6 Cir., 211 F.2d 190 ; Jesionowski v. boston & Maine R.R., 329 U.S. 452, 457 , 67 S.Ct. 401 , 91 L.Ed. 416 ; Johnson v. United States, 333 U.S. 46, 48 , 68 S.Ct. 391 , 92 L.Ed. 468 19 The quoted language is from Sweeney v. Erving, 228 U.S. 233 , 33 S.Ct. 416 , 57 L.Ed. 815 , as quoted in the Jesionowski case, supra ( 329 U.S. 452 , 67 S.Ct. 404 ).
discussed Cited "see" Bedal v. Hallack & Howard Lumber Co.
9th Cir. · 1955 · signal: see · confidence high
See O’Neill v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co., 348 U.S. 956 , 75 S.Ct. 447 , apparently approving the dissenting opinion in Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. O’Neill, 6 Cir., 211 F.2d 190 ; Jesionowski v. Boston & Maine R.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Aunt Mid, Inc. v. Fjell-Oranje Lines
7th Cir. · 1972 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 20 , 75 S.Ct. 6 , 99 L.Ed. 20 (1954), modif. denied, 348 U.S. 957 , 75 S.Ct. 447 , 99 L.Ed. 748 (1955).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
O'Neill
v.
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.
No. 105.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 7, 1955.
348 U.S. 956
C. Richard Orieser argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner., Robert F. Ebinger argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were E. H. Burgess, Kenneth H. Ekin and Arvin J. Alexander.
Cited by 29 opinions  |  Published

Certiorari, 348 U. S. 812, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the ease is remanded to the District Court with instructions to reinstate its order dated July 30, 1952.