green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Hare v. Family Publications Service, Inc.
See Palmer v. Fisher, 228 F.2d 603 (7th Cir. 1955), cert, denied, 351 U.S. 965 , 76 S. Ct. 1030 , 100 L.Ed. 1485 (1956).
cited
Cited "see"
R. & J. DICK CO. v. Bass
See Palmer v. Fisher, 228 F.2d 603 (7th Cir., 1955), cert. denied 351 U.S. 965 , 76 S.Ct. 1030 , 100 L.Ed. 1485 ; Ex Parte Sparrow, 14 F.R.D. 351 (N.D.Ala., 1953).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hill v. Huddleston
See Palmer v. Fisher, 7 Cir., 228 F.2d 603 (1955), cert. den. 351 U.S. 965 , 76 S.Ct. 1030 , 100 L.Ed. 1485 (1956); Application of Cepeda, S.D.N.Y., 233 F.Supp. 465 (1964); Ex parte Sparrow, N.D.Ala., 14 F.R.D. 351 (1953).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Conrad v. Randall
But even assuming, without deciding, that this contention is correct, cf., District of Columbia v. Faison, 278 A.2d 688, 690 (D.C.1971) ("interlocutory rulings do not settle the law of a case”), Mrs. Conrad is free, on appeal from Judge Wolf's final judgment, to challenge any interlocutory ruling, not previously appealable, that "led to entry of the final judgment and thus may have infected with error that judgment.” Desmond v. Robertson, 211 A.2d 775 , 776 & n. 2 (D.C.1965); see also Palmer v. Fisher, 228 F.2d 603, 607 (7th Cir.1955), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 965 , 76 S.Ct. 1030 , 100 L.Ed.…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Consolidation Coal Co. v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.
See, e.g., Palmer v. Fisher (7th Cir. 1955), 228 F.2d 603 , cert, denied sub nom Fisher v. Pierce (1956), 351 U.S. 965 , 100 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Scott v. McDonald
See, e. g., Palmer v. Fisher, 228 F.2d 603 (7th Cir. 1955) cert. denied 351 U.S. 965 , 76 S.Ct. 1030 , 100 L.Ed. 1485 (1956); Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Brei, 311 F.2d 463 (2d Cir. 1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca7 1971
In any case, the statute or rule which favors the reception of the evidence governs and the evidence shall be presented according to the most convenient method prescribed in any of the statutes or rules to which reference is herein made." 3 See Pasternak v. Pan American Petroleum Corp., 417 F.2d 1292 (10th Cir. 1969); Monarch Insurance Company v. Spach, 281 F.2d 401 (5th Cir. 1960); 5 Moore's Federal Practice, ¶ 43.04, pp. 1343-46; compare Palmer v. Fisher, 228 F.2d 603 (7th Cir. 1955), cert. denied sub nom, Fisher v. Pierce, 351 U.S. 965 , 76 S.Ct. 1030 , 100 L.Ed. 1485 overruled on other gr…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Trans-Cold Express, Inc. v. Arrow Motor Transit, Inc.
See Pasternak v. Pan American Petroleum Corp., 417 F.2d 1292 (10th Cir. 1969) ; Monarch Insurance Company v. Spach, 281 F.2d 401 (5th Cir. 1960) ; 5 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 43.04, pp. 1343-46; compare Palmer v. Fisher, 228 F.2d 603 (7th Cir. 1955), cert. denied sub nom, Fisher v. Pierce, 351 U.S. 965 , 76 S.Ct. 1030 , 100 L.Ed. 1485 overruled on other grounds, Carter Products, Inc. v. Eversharp, Inc., 360 F.2d 868 (7th Cir. 1966). .
Shapitz
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 905.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 4, 1956.
351 U.S. 965
G. Leslie Field for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.