Brownell v. Tom We Shung, 351 U.S. 905 (1956). · Go Syfert
Search
Brownell v. Tom We Shung, 351 U.S. 905 (1956). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“ny unexplained severance of the relationship of employer and employee gives rise to speculations as to the reasons for it in the minds of interested persons, but something more than mere speculation is required to form the basis of a charge of libel or slander”
41 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Elias v. Youngken (ri, 1985-05-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Elias v. Youngken
R.I. · 1985 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
ny unexplained severance of the relationship of employer and employee gives rise to speculations as to the reasons for it in the minds of interested persons, but something more than mere speculation is required to form the basis of a charge of libel or slander
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brownell, Attorney General
v.
Tom We Shung
No. 743.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 23, 1956.
351 U.S. 905
Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Isabelle Cappello for petitioner. Jack Wassérman for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Rhode Island (1)

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari granted.