green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1975 ·
…where the interlocutory order, for all practical purposes, presents a somewhat final aspect, an appellate court will review it in order to safeguard basic human rights or to prevent a great injustice to a defendant.
⚠ not in text
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Barber
where the interlocutory order, for all practical purposes, presents a somewhat final aspect, an appellate court will review it in order to safeguard basic human rights or to prevent a great injustice to a defendant.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Barber
where the interlocutory order, for all practical purposes, presents a somewhat final aspect, an appellate court will review it in order to safeguard basic human rights or to prevent a great injustice to a defendant.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Novak
v.
Pennsylvania
v.
Pennsylvania
No. 102.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1956.
Walter Stein and Mervyn R. Turk for petitioner. Raymond R. Start for respondent.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (2)
Supreme Court of .Pennsylvania, Eastern District. Certiorari denied.