green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Blinder, Robinson & Co. v. Tom
Ungar v. Sarafite [(1964)] 376 U.S. 575, 584-585 [ 11 L.Ed.2d 921, 928-929 , 84 S.Ct. 841 ]; Nilva v. United States [(1957)] 352 U.S. 385, 395-396 [ 1 L.Ed.2d 415, 423-424 , 77 S.Ct. 43 1].” Where due process requires an administrative hearing', an individual has the right to a tribunal which meets at least currently prevailing standards of impartiality.
discussed
Cited "see"
University of Colorado Foundation, Inc. v. American Cyanamid
See Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Carter Products, Inc., 230 F.2d 855, 865 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 843 , 77 S.Ct. 43 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956) (assignment ordered due to misappropriation of a trade secret resulting “from the employment-of one to whom it had been imparted in the course of a former employment”); De Long Corp. v. Lucas, 176 F.Supp. 104, 134 (S.D.N.Y.1959), aff'd, 278 F.2d 804 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 833 , 81 S.Ct. 71 , 5 L.Ed.2d 58 (1960) (former employee’s breach of no-competition clause and breach of covenant not to disclose trade secrets entitled former empl…
cited
Cited "see"
Doubleday & Co., Inc. v. United States
See Cory v. Commissioner, 230 F.2d 941, 944 (2d Cir.1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 828 , 77 S.Ct. 43 , 1 L.Ed.2d 50 (1956).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reilly v. United States
See Carter Products, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., 130 F.Supp. 557 (D.Md.1955), aff’d 230 F.2d 855 (4th Cir.1956), cert. denied 352 U.S. 843 , 77 S.Ct. 43 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956); Specialty Equipment & Machinery Corp. v. Zell Motor Car Co., 113 F.Supp. 161 (D.Md.1953).
cited
Cited "see"
Radio Corporation of America v. Philco Corporation
See Colgate-Palmolive Company v. Carter Products, 230 F.2d 855 (4th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 843 , 77 S.Ct. 43 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956).
cited
Cited "see"
George P. Converse & Co. v. Standard Packaging Corp.
See Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Carter Products, Inc., 4 Cir., 1956, 230 F.2d 855, 862 , certiorari denied 352 U.S. 843 , 77 S.Ct. 43 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taborsky v. State
Such remedy is appropriate under the circumstances; see, e.g., Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Carter Products, Inc., 230 F.2d 855, 865 , 108 USPQ 383, 391 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 843 , 77 S.Ct. 43 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956) (corporate assignee of patent application ordered to assign to original holder of trade secrets all rights to patent applications based thereon); DeLong Corp. v. Lucas, 176 F. Supp. 104, 134 (S.D.N.Y. 1959), aff'd., 278 F.2d 804 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 833 , 81 S.Ct. 71 , 5 L.Ed.2d 58 (1960) (when an employee has acquired patents on inventions developed by his for…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.
Such remedy is appropriate under the circumstances; see, e.g., Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Carter Products, Inc., 230 F.2d 855, 865 , 108 USPQ 383, 391 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 843 , 77 S.Ct. 43 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956) (corporate assignee of patent application ordered to assign to original holder of trade secrets all rights to patent applications based thereon); De Long Corp. v. Lucas, 176 F.Supp. 104, 134 (S.D.N.Y.1959), aff'd, 278 F.2d 804 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 833 , 81 S.Ct. 71 , 5 L.Ed.2d 58 (1960) (when an employee has acquired patents on inventions developed by his form…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co.
Such remedy is appropriate under the circumstances; see, e.g., Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Carter Products, Inc., 230 F.2d 855, 865 , 108 USPQ 383, 391 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 843 , 77 S.Ct. 43 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956) (corporate assignee of patent application ordered to assign to original holder of trade secrets all rights to patent applications based thereon); De Long Corp. v. Lucas, 176 F.Supp. 104, 134 (S.D.N.Y.1959), aff'd, 278 F.2d 804 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 833 , 81 S.Ct. 71 , 5 L.Ed.2d 58 (1960) (when an employee has acquired patents on inventions developed by his form…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rockefeller v. Commissioner
See, e.g., Danz v. Commissioner, 18 T.C. 454 (1952), aff’d on other grounds, 231 F.2d 673 (9th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 828 , 77 S.Ct. 43 , 1 L.Ed.2d 50 (1956); Bowman v. Commissioner, 16 B.T.A. 1157 (1929); Rev.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David Rockefeller and Margaret McG Rockefeller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Estate of John D. Rockefeller, 3rd, Deceased, John D. Rockefeller, Iv, J. Richardson Dilworth and Donal C. O'brien, Jr., Executors, and Blanchette H. Rockefeller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See, e.g., Danz v. Commissioner, 18 T.C. 454 (1952), aff'd on other grounds, 231 F.2d 673 (9th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 828 , 77 S.Ct. 43 , 1 L.Ed.2d 50 (1956); Bowman v. Commissioner, 16 B.T.A. 1157 (1929); Rev.Rul. 194, 1953- 2 C.B. 128 ; Rev.Rul. 55-275, 1955- 1 C.B. 295 . 11 Prior to the 1954 Code, a deduction for charitable contributions was allowed up to a maximum of twenty percent of a taxpayer's net income, unless the unlimited deduction applied.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Reeves Instrument Corporation and Dynamics Corporation of America v. Beckman Instruments, Incorporated
See also Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Carter Products, Inc., 230 F.2d 855 (4th Cir.) cert. denied 352 U.S. 843 , 77 S.Ct. 43 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956). 10 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John Danz Charitable Trust
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 145.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1956.
F. A. LeSourd for petitioner. Simon E. Sobeloff, then Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Rice, Hilbert P. Zarky and Melva M. Graney for respondent.
Published
[*828] C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.