green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
City of Philadelphia v. Cumberland County Board of Assessment Appeals
See Commonwealth v. [Board of City Trusts ], 357 U.S. 570 , 78 S.Ct. 1383 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1546 (1958).
cited
Cited "see"
Brown v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
See Moe v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., 246 F.2d 215 (5th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 357 U.S. 936 , 78 S.Ct. 1380 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1550 (1958); Armstrong v. Baker, 394 F.Supp. 1380 (N.D.W.Va.1975). 2 III.
discussed
Cited "see"
Shapiro v. Columbia Union National Bank & Trust Co.
(2×)
The Philadelphia case has a long history: See In re Girard Trusteeship, 391 Pa. 434 , 138 A.2d 844 (1958), cert. den. 357 U.S. 570 , 78 S.Ct. 1383 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1546 (1958); Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Brown, 270 F.Supp. 782 (E.D.Pa.1967); Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Brown, 392 F.2d 120 (3rd Cir. 1968), cert. den. 391 U.S. 921 , 88 S.Ct. 1811 , 20 L.Ed.2d 657 (1968); Clark, Charitable Trusts, The Fourteenth Amendment and the Will of Stephen Girard, 66 Yale L.J. 979 (1957); IV Scott, Trusts, § 370.5, pp. 2876-2878 (1967). [14] See Lewis, The Meaning of State Action, 60 Colum.L.Rev. 1083 …
discussed
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. White Lumber Sales, Inc. v. Sulmonetti
See Atkinson v. Superior Court, 49 Cal.2d 338 , 316 P.2d 960 (1957), appeal dismissed, American Fed. of Musician of U.S. & Canada v. Atkinson, 357 U.S. 569 , 78 S.Ct. 1381 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1546 (1958), noted 46 Calif.L.Rev. 637 (1958). [10] See ORS 14.080. [11] See von Mehren and Trautman, supra note 8 at 1127, n. 13. [12] Barrett, Venue and Service of Process in the Federal Courts Suggestions for Reform, 7 Vand.L.Rev. 608 at 628 (1954). [13] Ibid. at 629. [14] The comment on Section 1314 of the study reads: "This subsection gives plaintiff a choice of forum.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
George W. Bell, Jr., James E. Brewton, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Aerodex, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
Compare Altgens v. Associated Press, 5 Cir. 1951, 188 F.2d 727 , with Moe v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 5 Cir. 1957, 246 F.2d 215 , cert. denied, 1958, 357 U.S. 936 , 78 S.Ct. 1380 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1550 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
FIRST METHODIST CHURCH OF SAN LEANDRO Et Al.
v.
HORSTMANN, ASSESSOR OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, Et Al.
v.
HORSTMANN, ASSESSOR OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, Et Al.
485.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 30, 1958.
Stanley A. Weigel, Lawrence Speiser and Frank B. Frederick for appellants., /. F. Coakley for appellees, and Arthur M. Carden for the City of San Leandro, appellee.
Nos.
Cited by 9 opinions | Published
Per Curiam.
The judgment is reversed. No. 382, First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. County of Los Angeles, ante, p. 545; No. 385, Valley Unitarian-Universalist Church, Inc., v. County of Los Angeles, ante, p. 545; No. 483, Speiser v. Randall, ante, p. 513, and No. 484, Prince v. City and County of San Francisco, ante, p. 513, decided this day.
Mr. Justice Clark dissents for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in Nos. 382 and 385, and Nos. 483 and 484, decided this day. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.