green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Hodgson v. HYATT REALTY AND INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC.
See Schenley Distillers v. United States, 153 F.Supp. 898, 904 (W.D.Pa. 1957), aff'd, 255 F.2d 334 (3rd Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 835 , 79 S.Ct. 57 , 3 L.Ed.2d 72 (1958), for definitions of an excise tax.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hodgson v. Hyatt Realty & Investment Co.
See Schenley Distillers v. United States, 153 F.Supp. 898, 904 (W.D.Pa. 1957), aff’d, 255 F.2d 334 (3rd Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 835 , 79 S.Ct. 57 , 3 L.Ed.2d 72 (1958), for definitions of an excise tax.
cited
Cited "see"
Patrick A. McKenna v. Fred A. Seaton, Secretary of the Interior, and John C. De Armas, Jr.
See 79 S.Ct. 57 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McKenna
v.
Seaton, Secretary of the Interior
v.
Seaton, Secretary of the Interior
No. 253.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1958.
Robert H. Riñes, Samuel Nakasian and Nelson H. Shapiro for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Morton, Roger P. Marquis and Fred W. Smith for the Secretary of the Interior, and Marvin J. Sonosky for deArmas, respondents.
Published
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.