Snyder v. Town of Newtown, 365 U.S. 299 (1961). · Go Syfert
Search
Snyder v. Town of Newtown, 365 U.S. 299 (1961). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
193 citation events (24 in the last 25 years) across 34 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Stafford Bd. of Ed. v. State Bd. of Ed., No. Cv95 0057771 S (Nov. 13, 1996) (connsuperct, 1996-11-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961 1993 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Stafford Bd. of Ed. v. State Bd. of Ed., No. Cv95 0057771 S (Nov. 13, 1996)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1996 · confidence medium
Stafford, like the State, "is under a duty to ignore the child's creed, but not its need." (Citation and internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 388.
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Clemente
Conn. · 1974 · confidence medium
Ct. 692, 5 L.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Smith v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n of Montgomery, Inc.
M.D. Ala. · 1970 · confidence medium
Evans v. Newton, supra, 365 U.S. at 299, 86 S.Ct. at 488 . 27 .
examined Cited "see" Board of Education v. State Board of Education (3×)
Conn. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Snyder v. Newtown, 147 Conn. 374 , 161 A.2d 770 , appeal dismissed, 365 U.S. 299 , 81 S. Ct. 692 , 5 L.
discussed Cited "see" Fuchs Sugars & Syrups, Inc. v. Amstar Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kentucky Rural Electric Corp. v. Moloney Electric Corp., 282 F.2d 481, 484 (6th Cir. 1960), cert, denied, 365 U.S. 812 , 81 S.Ct. 692 , 5 L.Ed.2d 691 (1961) (held § 2(c) violation was defense to plaintiff’s claim under other sections of the Robinson-Pat-man Act); cf. United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 550 F.2d 115 (3d Cir.), cert, granted, 434 U.S. 815 , 98 S.Ct. 52 , 54 L.Ed.2d 71 .
examined Cited "see" State v. DellaCamera (3×)
Conn. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
Sanger v. Bridgeport, 124 Conn. 183, 190 , 198 A. 746 ; see Snyder v. Newtown, 147 Conn. 374, 386 , 161 A.2d 770 , appeal dismissed, 365 U.S. 299 , 81 S. Ct. 692 , 5 L.
discussed Cited "see" Hughes Tool Company, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. G. W. Murphy Industries, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross (2×)
5th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Union Carbide Corp. v. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co., 7 Cir. 1960, 282 F.2d 653 , 670-671, cert. denied, 365 U.S. 812 , 81 S.Ct. 692 , 5 L.Ed.2d 691 ; Columbia Wire Co. v. Kokomo Steel & Wire Co., 7 Cir. 1911, 194 F. 108, 110 .
discussed Cited "see" National Labor Relations Board v. Gotham Industries, Inc., and Crawford Plastics Corp.
1st Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Celanese Corp., 1958, 121 N.L.R.B. 303 , 307, enforcement denied 7 Cir., 279 F.2d 204 , vacated and remanded per curiam 365 U.S. 297 , 81 S.Ct. 689 , 5 L.Ed.2d 688 , enforcement denied 291 F.2d 224 , cert. denied 368 U.S. 925 , 82 S.Ct. 360 , 7 L.Ed.2d 189 ; United Steelworkers v. NLRB, D.C.Cir., 1968, 393 F.2d 661 , 664; NLRB v. Trancoa Chem.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Deere & Company v. International Harvester Company
7th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Union Carbide Corp. v. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co., 282 F.2d 653 , 660 (7th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 812 , 81 S.Ct. 692 , 5 L.Ed.2d 691 (1961).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Betty Eby, a Widow v. Reb Realty, Inc., an Arizona Corporation, and Don Dailey Realty, an Arizona Corporation
9th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corp. v. Moloney Electric Co., 282 F.2d 481, 483-484 (6th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 812 , 81 S.Ct. 692 , 5 L.Ed.2d 691 (1961); Leas v. Courtney Co., 261 F.2d 13 (4th Cir. 1958); Koepfle v. Garavaglia, 200 F.2d 191, 192-193 (6th Cir. 1952); 10 C.A.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SNYDER Et Al.
v.
TOWN OF NEWTOWN Et Al.
580.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 1961.
365 U.S. 299
Philip Reich for appellants., James J. O’Connell and Albert L. Coles for appellees.
Frankfurter, Douglas.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.