green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
4.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1986 ·
…the antitrust laws were never meant to be a panacea for all wrongs.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2006 ·
…we are not concerned with labels. otherwise, an adroit antitrust lawyer might use his skill in the use of words to convert many unlawful acts into antitrust violations.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust Litigation
(2×)
we are not concerned with labels. otherwise, an adroit antitrust lawyer might use his skill in the use of words to convert many unlawful acts into antitrust violations.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hudson's Bay Co. Fur Sales Inc. v. American Legend Co-Op.
(2×)
the antitrust laws were never meant to be a panacea for all wrongs.
discussed
Cited "see"
Astra Media Group, LLC v. Clear Channel Taxi Media, LLC
(2×)
See Bustop Shelters, Inc. v. Convenience & Safety Corp., 521 F.Supp. 989, fn. 10 (S.D.N.Y.1981) (recognizing the maxim that "(t)he antitrust laws were never meant to be a panacea for all wrongs” (citing Parmelee Transportation Co. v. Keeshin, 292 F.2d 794, 804 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 944 , 82 S.Ct. 376 , 7 L.Ed.2d 340 (1961))). 27 .
cited
Cited "see"
Barry v. Woods
See United States v. Allen, 293 F.2d 916 (10th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 944 , 82 S.Ct. 378 , 7 L.Ed.2d 340 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tremont Public Advisors, LLC v. Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority
(2×)
Indeed, although ‘‘[t]he parties may break a host of state or federal laws and regulations in making a side deal or in otherwise circumventing the bidding process in reaching a final arrangement . . . they do not breach [§] 1 of the Sherman Act where the alleged vertical agreements involve only one buyer and one seller.’’ Expert Masonry, Inc. v. Boone County, 440 F.3d 336, 348 (6th Cir. 2006); see also Parmelee Transportation Co. v. Keeshin, 292 F.2d 794, 804 (7th Cir.) (when plain- tiff alleged that defendant had bribed government offi- cial to use his influence to ensure that railro…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cow Palace, Ltd. v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc.
(2×)
Moreover, after the Supreme Court’s holding in Pennington , the Ninth Circuit has disapproved its decision in Harman. [See, Sun Valley Disposal Co. v. Silver State Disposal Co., 420 F.2d 341 (9th *705 Cir. 1969); see also, Parmelee Transportation Co. v. Keeshin, 292 F.2d 794 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 944 , 82 S.Ct. 376 , 7 L.Ed.2d 340 (1961); Note, 81 Harv.L.Rev. 847, 856-57 (1968)] In light of the foregoing analysis, we conclude that all of plaintiffs’ arguments against application of the Noerr-Pennington doctrine must be rejected.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Parmelee Transportation Co.
v.
Keeshin
v.
Keeshin
No. 431.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 11, 1961.
Lee A. Freeman, Thomas C. McConnell, Herbert B. Lazarus and John Paul Stevens for petitioner.. Edward B. Johnston, Albert E. Jenner, Jr., Philip W. Tone, Albert J. Meserow and Amos M. Mathews for respondents.
Are, Black, Granted, Should.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: N.D. Illinois (2) · D. New Jersey (2)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.