Consol. Edison Co. of New York v. United States, 369 U.S. 850 (1962). · Go Syfert
Consol. Edison Co. of New York v. United States, 369 U.S. 850 (1962). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
127 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 30 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ramos v. Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ca5, 2006-06-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Ramos v. Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement
5th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Wood, 295 F.2d 772, 778 (5th Cir.1961) (construing the denial of a TRO as a final order for appealability purposes in order to preserve determination of the parties’ substantial rights), cert, denied, 369 U.S. 850 , 82 S.Ct. 933 , 8 L.Ed.2d 9 (1962).
discussed Cited "see" State Ex Rel. Martinez v. Kerr-McGee (2×)
N.M. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Switzer Bros., Inc. v. Locklin, 297 F.2d 39, 45 (7th Cir.1961) (the absence of a finding is equivalent to a finding against the party who had the burden of establishing a certain fact), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 851 , 82 S.Ct. 934 , 935, 8 L.Ed.2d 9 (1962); Woods v. Turner, 172 F.2d 313, 315 (10th Cir.1949) (same).
discussed Cited "see" Kalima Jenkins, by Her Friend, Kamau Agyei Carolyn Dawson, by Her Next Friend Richard Dawson Tufanza A. Byrd, by Her Next Friend, Teresa Byrd Derek A. Dydell Terrance Cason, by His Next Friend, Antoria Cason Jonathan Wiggins, by His Next Friend, Rosemary Jacobs Love Kirk Allan Ward, by His Next Friend, Mary Ward Robert M. Hall, by His Next Friend, Denise Hall Dwayne A. Turrentine, by His Next Friend, Sheila Turrentine Gregory A. Pugh, by His Next Friend, David Winters, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, American Federation of Teachers, Local 691 v. State of Missouri John Ashcroft, Governor of the State of Missouri Wendell Bailey, Treasurer of the State of Missouri Missouri State Board of Education Roseann Bentley Dan L. Blackwell Gary M. Cunningham Raymond McCallister Jr. Susan D. Finke Thomas R. Davis Cynthia B. Thompson, Members of the Missouri State Board of Education Robert E. Bartman, Commissioner of Education of the State of Missouri, School District of Kansas City, Missouri Claude C. Perkins, Superintendent Thereof, Kalima Jenkins, by Her Next Friend, Kamau Agyei Carolyn Dawson, by Her Next Friend, Richard Dawson Tufanza A. Byrd, by Her Next Friend, Teresa Byrd Derek A. Dydell, by His Next Friend, Maurice Dydell Terrance Cason, by His Next Friend, Antoria Cason Jonathan Wiggins, by His Next Friend, Rosemary Jacobs Love Kirk Allen Ward, by His Next Friend, Mary Ward Robert M. Hall, by His Next Friend, Denise Hall Dwayne A. Turrentine, by His Next Friend, Sheila Turrentine Gregory A. Pugh, by His Next Friend, David Winters on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, American Federation of Teachers, Local 691, Intervenor-Appellee v. State of Missouri John Ashcroft, Governor of the State of Missouri Wendell Bailey, Treasurer of the State of Missouri Missouri State Board of Education Peter Herschend, Member of the Missouri State Board of Education Raymond McCallister Jr., Reverend, Member of the Missouri State Board of Education Susan D. Finke, Vice-President, Member of the Missouri State Board of Education Thomas R. Davis, Member of the Missouri State Board of Education Robert E. Bartman, Commissioner of Education of the State of Missouri Gary D. Cunningham, President, Member of the Missouri State Board of Education Rebecca M. Cook, Member of the Missouri State Board of Education Sharon M. Williams, Member of the Missouri State Board of Education Jacquelline Wellington, Member of the Missouri State Board of Education, School District of Kansas City Walter L. Marks, Superintendent Thereof (2×)
8th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Switzer Brothers, Inc. v. Locklin, 297 F.2d 39, 45 (7th Cir.1961) ("[F]ailure to enter findings with respect [to certain evidence] is tantamount to findings adverse to appellants upon the evidence."), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 851 , 82 S.Ct. 934 , 935, 8 L.Ed.2d 9 (1962).
discussed Cited "see" Jenkins ex rel. Agyei v. Missouri (2×)
8th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Switzer Brothers, Inc. v. Locklin, 297 F.2d 39, 45 (7th Cir.1961) (“[Fjailure to enter findings with respect [to certain evidence] is tantamount to findings adverse to appellants upon the evidence.”), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 851 , 82 S.Ct. 934 , 935, 8 L.Ed.2d 9 (1962).
discussed Cited "see" Reaemco, Inc. v. Allegheny Airlines
S.D.N.Y. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
The basis for this argument is that Reaemco has not alleged any injury to itself resulting from the purported violations of the Act. “[B]efore any party can recover under the act he must show not merely the wrong of the carrier, but that the wrong has in fact operated to his injury.” Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. International Coal Mining Co., 230 U.S. 184, 200 , 33 S.Ct. 893, 897 , 57 L.Ed. 1446 (1913); see Shaw Warehouse Co. v. Southern Railway Co., 288 F.2d 759, 775 (5th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 850 , 82 S.Ct. 933 , 8 L.Ed.2d 9 (1962).
cited Cited "see" In Re 1975-2 Grand Jury Investigation of Associated Milk Producers, Inc. Appeal of Associated Milk Producers, Inc
5th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally *1300 United States v. Wood, 5 Cir., 1961, 295 F.2d 772, 777-78 , cert. denied, 369 U.S. 850 , 82 S.Ct. 933 , 8 L.Ed.2d 9 (1962).
examined Cited "see" Ralph Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc. (4×)
D.C. Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Switzer Bros., Inc. v. Locklin, 297 F.2d 39, 45 (7th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 851 , 82 S.Ct. 934 , 8 L.Ed.2d 9 (1962).
discussed Cited "see" Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Company, Inc. (2×)
N.D. Cal. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Switzer Brothers, Inc. v. Locklin, 297 F.2d 39, 43-44 (7 Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 851 , 82 S.Ct. 934 , 935, 8 L.Ed.2d 9 (1962), rehearing denied, 369 U.S. 891 , 82 S.Ct. 1157 , 8 L.Ed.2d 291 (1962).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Blanchard McLeod United States of America v. Dallas County
5th Cir. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Wood, 5 Cir. 1961, 295 F.2d 772 , cert. denied, 369 U.S. 850 , 82 S.Ct. 933 , 8 L.Ed.2d 9 ; United States v. Edwards, 5 Cir. 1964, 333 F.2d 575, 579-581 (Brown, J., dissenting). .
cited Cited "see" James A. Paynes v. Dan Dee Lee
5th Cir. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Wood, 5th Cir. 1961, 295 F.2d 772 , cert. den. 369 U.S. 850 , 82 S.Ct. 933 , 8 L.Ed.2d 9 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dameron v. Capitol House Associates Ltd. Partnership
D.C. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Wood, 295 F.2d 772 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 369 U.S. 850 , 82 S.Ct. 933 , 8 L.Ed.2d 9 (1961); see also Wright, Miller & Cooper, 15 Federal Practice and Procedure: Jurisdiction § 3911 at 495.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Distillers Co. Ltd. (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1975 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Switzer Brothers, Inc. v. Locklin, 297 F.2d 39, 47 (7th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 851 , 82 S.Ct. 934 , 8 L.Ed.2d 9 (1962); Allied Electric Supply Co. v. Motorola, Inc., 369 F.Supp. 133, 138 (W.D.Pa.1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State of Washington v. American Pipe & Construction Co. (2×)
D. Haw. · 1968 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Switzer Brothers, Inc. v. Locklin, 297 F.2d 39, 47 (7 Cir. 1961), cert. denied 369 U.S. 851 , 82 S.Ct. 934 , 8 L.Ed.2d 9 (1962); E.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Chappell & Co., Inc., T. B. Harms Company, Williamson Music, Inc., Frank Loesser and Frank Music Corp. v. J. Jay Frankel
2d Cir. · 1966 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Wood, 295 F.2d 772 (5 Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 850 , 82 S.Ct. 933 , 8 L.Ed.2d 9 (1962).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Joseph F. Savage, Lesley Andrew, and Daniel Creem Savage, as Executors of the Last Will and Testament of Edna Savage Becker, Deceased v. United States
2d Cir. · 1964 · signal: see also · confidence low
The argument is based upon the legislative history of Section 811(c) (1) (B) and its successor provision, Section 2036 of the 1954 Code which we summarized in Commissioner v. Estate of Canfield, 306 F.2d 1 (2d Cir. 1962) ; see also Commissioner v. Estate of Arents, 297 F.2d 894 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 848, 82 S.Ct 932 , 8 L.Ed.2d 9 (1962).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
v.
United States
No. 757.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 16, 1962.
369 U.S. 850
James K. Polk, Richard Joyce Smith and Julius M. Jacobs for petitioner., Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and John B. J ones, Jr. for the United States.
Cited by 91 opinions  |  Published

Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.