green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
M'Otto Enterprises, Inc. v. Redsand, Inc.
See, Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149, 154 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
Philip Morris, Inc. v. Emerson
See Halliburton Co. v. Norton Drilling Co., 302 F.2d 431, 437 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1963); Guarnieri v. Kewanee-Ross Corp., 270 F.2d 575, 579-80 (2d Cir.1959); Lattea, Adm'r., 9 Ohio App. 3d at 122 , 458 N.E.2d at 873 .
cited
Cited "see"
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. v. Hibernia Bank
See Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149, 151 (9th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1963); see also E.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sicilia Di R. Biebow & Co. v. Ronald C. Cox and Sales U.S.A., Inc.
See Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149, 161 (9th Cir.) (whole range of decisions in trademark infringement field illustrates conclusion “that an infringer seldom makes a Chinese copy of another’s trademark, package or label”), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1963). *432 Another consideration is the “previous contractual or business relations between the parties.” Falcon Rice, 725 F.2d at 345 n. 9 (quoting Sun-Fun, 656 F.2d at 189 ). “[T]his factor will usually be considered as a subcategory of ‘intent.’ ” Id.
discussed
Cited "see"
The Coca-Cola Company, a Corporation v. Overland, Inc., Doing Business as Topaz Lodge and Casino, and R.H. Hobson
Coca-Cola Co. v. Dorris, 311 F.Supp. at 290 ; see Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149, 157-58 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1963); Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Rudner, 246 F.2d 826, 829 (9th Cir.1957).
cited
Cited "see"
Paul Smith, an Individual v. Edward L. Montoro and Film Ventures International Inc.
See Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149, 151 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1963); F.E.L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lyle S. Woodcock v. R. W. Amaral
See United States v. Leonard, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 36 , 494 F.2d 955, 970 (1974), citing Gorin v. United States, 313 F.2d 641, 645-46 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1963). 19 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Prieur
See Gorin v. United States, 1st Cir., 313 F.2d 641 (1963), cert. den. 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 ; United States v. Gassaway, 5th Cir., 456 F.2d 624 (1972); United States v. Jackson, 5th Cir., 448 F.2d 539 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Irie E. Leonard, United States of America v. James L. Sarvis
(2×)
See Gorin v. United States, 313 F.2d 641, 645-646 (1 Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jones
See Gorin v. United States, 1st Cir., 313 F.2d 641 (1963), cert. den. 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 ; United States v. Gassaway, 5th Cir., 456 F.2d 624 (1972); United States v. Jackson, 5th Cir., 448 F.2d 539 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Mortellito v. Nina of California, Inc.
See Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149, 151 (9 Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1963); L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Chester Naquin, G & M Boats, Inc. v. Tidelands Marine Service, Inc., and Plaisance Dragline & Dredging Company, Inc.
See the case of Halliburton Company v. Norton Drilling Company, 302 F.2d 431 (5 Cir., 1962), *915 reh. den. 313 F.2d 380 (1963), cert. den. 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1963), which is similar factually on the indemnity question.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Vale
See, Gorin v. United States, 1 Cir., 313 F.2d 641 , cert, denied, 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed. 2d 1052 ; United States v. Sopher, 362 F.2d 523 , cert, denied, 385 U.S. 928 , 87 S.Ct. 286 , 17 L.Ed.2d 210 ; United States v. Van Allen, D.C., 28 F.R.D. 329 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Louis Pugliese, A/K/A \Feety
See Gorin v. United States, 313 F.2d 641, 654 (1 Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1963); Model Penal Code § 2.13(2) (Prop.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blinded Veterans Association v. Blinded American Veterans Foundation
See, e.g., Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149 (9th Cir.) ("Black & White” scotch whiskey), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1963); Mustang Motels, Inc. v. Patel, 226 U.S.P.Q. 526 (C.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blinded Veterans Ass'n v. Blinded American Veterans Foundation
See, e.g., Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149 (9th Cir.) ("Black & White" scotch whiskey), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1963); Mustang Motels, Inc. v. Patel, 226 U.S.P.Q. 526 (C.D.Cal.1985) ("Mustang” motels); see generally McCarthy § 11:4 at 440-41 (providing examples of arbitrary terms). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grey v. Campbell Soup Co.
See, e.g., Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149, 151-53 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1963); National Lead Co. v. Wolfe, 223 F.2d 195, 197-200 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 135 , 100 L.Ed. 778 (1955).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jellibeans, Incorporated, a Georgia Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Skating Clubs of Georgia, Inc., a Georgia Corporation, Cross-Appellee
This proposition is adhered to by a number of the circuit courts; see, e.g., Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149, 159 (9th Cir.1963) cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1963) (ultimate issue of likelihood of confusion is a question of law); Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Johnson, 219 F.2d 590, 591 (3rd Cir.1955); Millworth Converting Corp. v. Slifka, 276 F.2d 443, 445-46 (2nd Cir.1960); McCormick & Co. v. B.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Visa International Service Ass'n v. Visa Hotel Group, Inc.
See also Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149, 157-158 (9th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parfait v. Jahncke Service, Inc.
See, e. g., Halliburton Company v. Norton Drilling Company, 5th Cir. 1962, 302 F.2d 431 , reh. denied 1963, 313 F.2d 380 , cert. denied 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 ; American President Lines, Ltd. v. Marine Terminals Corporation, 9th Cir. 1956, 234 F.2d 753 , cert. denied 352 U.S. 926 , 77 S.Ct. 222 , 1 L.Ed.2d 161 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parfait v. Jahncke Service, Inc.
See, e. g., Halliburton Company v. Norton Drilling Company, 5th Cir. 1962, 302 F.2d 431 , reh. denied 1963, 313 F.2d 380 , cert, denied 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 ; American President Lines, Ltd. v. Marine Terminals Corporation, 9th Cir. 1956, 234 F.2d 753 , cert, denied 352 U.S. 926 , 77 S.Ct. 222 , 1 L.Ed.2d 161 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harvin v. United States
Compare with Gorin v. United States, 313 F.2d 641 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1963), and Fredrick v. United States, 163 F.2d 536 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 775 , 68 S.Ct. 87 , 92 L.Ed. 360 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Conester Gore, United States of America v. Haywood Liles
Compare Gorin v. United States, 313 F.2d 641, 647 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1963), with Brown v. United States, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 203 , 338 F.2d 543, 544 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Gillette
See also, Gorin v. United States, 313 F.2d 641, 647 (1st Cir.), cert. denied 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1963), not cited by appellant, which discusses the proper conduct of voir dire, holding that the refusal to ask particular questions such as those in issue here, including refusal to ask whether the jurors would presume guilt from the accusation, was not an abuse of discretion.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Platt, Chief Judge, U. S. District Court
v.
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
v.
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
No. 1064.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1963.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger and Robert B. Hummel for petitioner. John T. Chadwell, Jean Engstrom and John L. Connolly for respondent.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted.