green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.2 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gutierrez v. Bowen
(2×)
he application of res judicata and collateral estoppel is not required by constitutional law doctrines, but each is a judicially developed restriction invoked in the name of public policy requiring that a litigant be given only one day in court....
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Charles W. Stall, Jr. v. John E. Bourne, Jr., and Ross F. Walker
(4×)
... application of res judicata and collateral estoppel ... is a judicially developed restriction invoked in the name of public policy requiring that a litigant be given only one day in court.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kovac
(2×)
See also Hooper v. United States, 164 Ct.Cl. 151 , 326 F.2d 982 , cert. denied, 377 U.S. 977 , 84 S.Ct. 1882 , 12 L.Ed.2d 746 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McCarty v. McCarty
(2×)
See also Hooper v. United States, 164 Ct. Cl. 151 , 326 F. 2d 982 , cert, denied, 377 U. S. 977 (1964).
New Jersey
v.
Godfrey
v.
Godfrey
No. 1018.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 15, 1964.
Norman Heine for petitioner., M. Gene Haeberle for respondent.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Fourth Circuit (4) · S.D. New York (2)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.