green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1987 ·
…a forecast of tomorrow's weather is always subject to confirmation or modification by tomorrow's observation
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Marvin L. Fishman and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz, and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz
(2×)
a forecast of tomorrow's weather is always subject to confirmation or modification by tomorrow's observation
discussed
Cited "see"
HARRIS CTY TOLL RD. AUTH. v. Southwestern Bell Tel., LP
(2×)
See Hardin County v. Trunkline Gas Co., 311 F.2d 882, 884 (5th Cir.1963) (quoting former article 6674q-4 ("No further improvement of said [state highway] system shall be made with the aid of or with any moneys furnished by the counties except the acquisition of right-of-ways which may be furnished by the counties, their subdivisions or defined road districts.")), vacated 375 U.S. 8 , 84 S.Ct. 49 , 11 L.Ed.2d 38 , remanded to 330 F.2d 789 (5th Cir.1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris County Toll Road Authority and Harris County v. Southwestern Bell Telephone, LP D/B/A SBC Texas
(2×)
See Hardin County v. Trunkline Gas Co., 311 F.2d 882, 884 (5th Cir.1963) (quoting former article 6674q-4 (“No further improvement of said [state highway] system shall be made with the aid of or with any moneys furnished by the counties except the acquisition of right-of-ways which may be furnished by the counties, their subdivisions or defined road districts.”)), vacated 375 U.S. 8 , 84 S.Ct. 49 , 11 L.Ed.2d 38 , remanded to 330 F.2d 789 (5th Cir.1964).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Trunkline Gas Co.
v.
Hardin County
v.
Hardin County
153.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1963.
Cecil N. Cook for petitioner., William Robert Smith for respondent.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 10 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (2)
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, it appearing that the State of Texas has passed a statute in connection with controversies of this kind since the petition for a writ of certiorari was filed in this Court. This order is entered without reaching the merits.