cited Cited "see" Haskins v. Point Towing Co. See Daniels v. Florida Power & Light Company, 317 F.2d 41 (5th Cir.), cert. den. 375 U.S. 832 , 84 S.Ct. 78 , 11 L.Ed.2d 63 (1963).

discussed Cited "see" Haskins v. Point Towing Co. See Daniels v. Florida Power & Light Company, 317 F.2d 41 (5th Cir.), cert. den. 375 U.S. 832 , 84 S.Ct. 78 , 11 L.Ed.2d 63 (1963). 13 After a careful consideration of plaintiff's contention that the separate corporate entity of Bulk Towing, Inc. should be disregarded or that it should be treated as the agent of Point Towing Co., we have concluded that the record 7 requires affirmance of the District Court's conclusion that there has been no showing justifying the disregard of the separate corporate entities of Point Towing Co., Bulk Towing, Inc., and O-Kan Harbor, Inc. in this case.

cited Cited "see" Rosenstiel v. Rosenstiel Stetson Co., 128 F.2d 981, 983 (2d Cir. 1942); see Hollander v. Hollander, 318 F.2d 818 (2d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 831 , 84 S.Ct. 78 , 11 L.Ed.2d 63 (1963).

cited Cited "see" American Optical Company v. Rayex Corporation See Hollander v. Hollander, 318 F.2d 818 (2d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 831 , 84 S.Ct. 78 , 11 L.Ed.2d 63 (1963); Cassidy v. Puett Elec.