green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.3 score
“where an act of congress ... or an executive regulation ... arguably confers such rights upon the claimant, the court will assume jurisdiction and decide his case on the merits, even though the defendant may ultimately prevail.”
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mark W. Bedingfield v. Department of Agriculture
where an act of congress ... or an executive regulation ... arguably confers such rights upon the claimant, the court will assume jurisdiction and decide his case on the merits, even though the defendant may ultimately prevail.
cited
Cited "see"
National Medical Enterprises, Inc. v. United States
See Ralston Steel Corp. v. United States, 169 Ct.Cl. 119, 125 , 340 F.2d 663, 667 , cert. denied, 381 U.S. 950 , 85 S.Ct. 1803 , 14 L.Ed.2d 723 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. United States
See Ralston Steel Corp. v. United States, 340 F.2d 663, 667 , 169 Ct.Cl. 119, 125 , cert. denied, 381 U.S. 950 , 85 S.Ct. 1803 , 14 L.Ed.2d 723 (1965) (“If the plaintiff asserts that his claim ‘arises under’ or is ‘founded’ on federal legislation or regulation ‘to determine whether that claim is well founded,’ the court ‘must take jurisdiction, whether its ultimate resolution is to be in the affirmative or the negative.' ’’ [citations omitted]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard A. Banks v. H. Lawrence Garrett, Iii, Secretary of the Navy
See Ralston Steel Corp. v. United States, 340 F.2d 663, 667 , 169 Ct.Cl. 119 cert. denied, 381 U.S. 950 , 85 S.Ct. 1803 , 14 L.Ed.2d 723 (1965) (Jurisdiction is appropriate if a claim “is not frivolous but arguable.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Banks v. Garrett
See Ralston Steel Corp. v. United States, 340 F.2d 663, 667 , 169 Ct.Cl. 119 cert. denied, 381 U.S. 950 , 85 S.Ct. 1803 , 14 L.Ed.2d 723 (1965) (Jurisdiction is appropriate if a claim “is not frivolous but arguable.”).
cited
Cited "see"
Brooks v. United States
See Ralston Steel Corp. v. United States, 340 F.2d 663, 669-72 , 169 Ct.Cl. 119 (1965), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 950 , 85 S.Ct. 1803 , 14 L.Ed.2d 723 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
Brooks v. United States
See Ralston Steel Corp. v. United States, 340 F.2d 663, 669-72 , 169 Ct.Cl. 119 (1965), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 950 , 85 S.Ct. 1803 , 14 L.Ed.2d 723 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
Packard v. United States
See Ralston Steel Corp. v. United States, 169 Ct. Cl. 119 , 125 & n.4, 340 F. 2d 663 , 667 & n.4, cert. denied, 381 U. S. 950 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
American Aspen Corp.
Levering Garrigues Co. v. Morrin, 289 U.S. 103, 105-06 (1933); see Ralston Steel Corp. v. United States, 169 Ct. Cl. 119 , 340 F. 2d 663 , cert. denied, 381 U.S. 950 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Somali Development Bank v. United States
See Ralston Steel Corp v. United States, 169 Ct. Cl. 119, 123-28 , 340 F. 2d 663, 666-69 , cert. denied, 381 U.S. 950 (1965), where the full court, upon authority of several Supreme Court cases cited, held that an arguable allegation of breach of contract Is all that Is required to establish our jurisdiction and calls for judgment on the merits rather than dismissal for want of jurisdiction.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mason v. United States
See Ralston Steel Corp. v. United States, 169 Ct. Cl. 119, 125-26 , 340 F. 2d 663, 667-68 , cert. denied, 381 U.S. 950 (1965); Eastport S.S. v. United States, 178 Ct. Cl. 599, 605-06 , 372 F. 2d 1002, 1007-08 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Mike Scarafiotti v. John G. Shea, AKA Jerry Shea
See In re Cole, 2 Cir., 342 F.2d 5, 7-8 , cert. denied, 381 U.S. 950 , 85 S. Ct. 1803 , 14 L.Ed.2d 723 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Albert Shlom
See Hair Industry, Ltd. v. United States, 340 F.2d 510 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 950 , 85 S.Ct. 1804 , 14 L.Ed.2d 724 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Shlom
See Hair Industry, Ltd. et al. v. United States, 340 F.2d 510 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 381 U.S. 950 , 85 S.Ct. 1804 , 14 L.Ed.2d 724 (1965). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Neves
See Hair Industry, Ltd. v. United States, 340 F.2d 510 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 950 , 85 S.Ct. 1804 , 14 L.Ed.2d 724 (1965); United States v. Fago, 319 F.2d 791 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 906 , 84 S.Ct. 197 , 11 L.Ed.2d 146 (1963); United States v. Guterma, 272 F.2d 344 (2d Cir. 1959); Lagow v. United States, 159 F.2d 245 (2d Cir. 1946), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 858 , 67 S.Ct. 1750 , 91 L.Ed. 1865 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roland Spruill v. Merit Systems Protection Board
See also Ralston Steel Corp. v. United States, 169 Ct.Cl. 119 , 340 F.2d 663 (Ct.Cl.), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 950 , 85 S.Ct. 1803 , 14 L.Ed.2d 723 (1965). 51 In the case of Do-Well Machine Shop, Inc. v. United States, 870 F.2d 637, 639-40 (Fed.Cir.1989), the issue was whether a successful affirmative defense of a time bar, raised by the Government against a claim for money due under a contract, went to the jurisdiction of the forum, or was a question of failure to state a claim for which relief could be granted.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Spruill v. Merit Systems Protection Board
See also Ralston Steel Corp. v. United States, 169 Ct.Cl. 119 , 340 F.2d 663 (Ct.Cl.), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 950 , 85 S.Ct. 1803 , 14 L.Ed.2d 723 (1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pierre v. United States
Id.; see also, Ralston Steel Corp. v. United States, 340 F.2d 663 , 169 Ct.Cl. 119 (1965), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 950 , 85 S.Ct. 1803 , 14 L.Ed.2d 723 (1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Raymond G. Lackhouse v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Internal Revenue Service, and Office of Personnel Management
See also Ralston Steel Corp. v. United States, 340 F.2d 663, 667-69 (Ct.Cl.), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 950 , 85 S.Ct. 1803 , 14 L.Ed.2d 723 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mitchell
(2×)
See also Ralston Steel Corp. v. United States, 169 Ct. Cl. 119, 125 , 340 F. 2d 663, 667 , cert. denied, 381 U. S. 950 (1965). 5 U. S. C. §5101 . 5 U. S. C. §5596 .
Cole
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 1062.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 7, 1965.
Edward Bennett Williams and Seymour B. Goldjeld for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Jones and Joseph M. Howard for the United States.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Federal Circuit (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.