Davis v. Neely, 379 U.S. 2 (1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Davis v. Neely, 379 U.S. 2 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Miles v. New Shoreham, et al. (nhd, 1996-07-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Miles v. New Shoreham, et al.
D.N.H. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Atlanta Motel, 379 U.S. at 1 In noting the controlling factors to consider during a commerce clause challenge to a state imposed regulation, the Supreme Court deferred, in part, to the findings by the District Court which, in turn, evaluated and considered whether the "total effect" of the law has in fact paralleled the purpose behind the regulation.
discussed Cited "see" Miles v. New Shoreham, et al.
D.N.H. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Atlanta Motel, 379 U.S. at 1 In noting the controlling factors to consider during a commerce clause challenge to a state imposed regulation, the Supreme Court deferred, in part, to the findings by the District Court which, in turn, evaluated and considered whether the "total effect" of the law has in fact paralleled the purpose behind the regulation.
cited Cited "see" Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau v. United States
unknown court · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Accelerated Transport-Pony Express, Inc. v. United States, 227 F.Supp. 815 (D.Vt.), aff’d, 379 U.S. 4 , 85 S.Ct. 43 , 13 L.Ed.2d 21 (1964).
cited Cited "see" Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau v. United States of America, Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau v. National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc.
8th Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Accelerated Transport-Pony Express, Inc. v. United States, 227 F.Supp. 815 (D.Vt.), aff'd, 379 U.S. 4 , 85 S.Ct. 43 , 13 L.Ed.2d 21 (1964).
DAVIS
v.
NEELY et ux.
No. 68.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1964.
379 U.S. 2
John W. Willis for appellant., Thomas D. Finney, Jr., and Grant W. Wiprud for appellees.
Published
Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.