Carrington v. Rash, 379 U.S. 812 (1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Carrington v. Rash, 379 U.S. 812 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “The effect of § 6 is to prolong agreements subject to its provisions regardless of what they say as to termination.”
39 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Air Line Pilots Ass'n International v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. (dcd, 1988-08-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Air Line Pilots Ass'n International v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
D.D.C. · 1988 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the effect of 6 is to prolong agreements subject to its provisions regardless of what they say as to termination.
discussed Cited "see" Air Line Pilots Association, International, Cross v. United Air Lines, Inc., Cross-Appellee
7th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Manning v. American Airlines, Inc., 329 F.2d 32, 35 (2d Cir.) (noting that the status quo requirement is “to prevent rocking of the boat by either side until the procedures of the Railroad Labor Act [have been] exhausted”), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817 , 85 S.Ct. 33 , 13 L.Ed.2d 29 (1964); American Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers Union, 57 L.R.R.M.
cited Cited "see" International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. Aloha Airlines, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Manning v. American Airlines, Inc., 329 F.2d 32, 34 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817 , 85 S.Ct. 33 , 13 L.Ed.2d 29 (1964).
discussed Cited "see" Airline Pilots Association, International v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., Flight Engineers' International Association, Paa Chapter, Afl-Cio v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Air Cargo, Inc. v. Local Union 851, 733 F.2d 241 , 246 (2d Cir.1984) (making clear that actual, objective working conditions constitute the Section 6 status quo only if both parties, either expressly or by their conduct, have indicated their consent to those conditions). 22 Nor is our decision in Manning v. American Airlines, Inc., 329 F.2d 32 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817 , 85 S.Ct. 33 , 13 L.Ed.2d 29 (1964), to the contrary.
cited Cited "see" Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
E.D.N.Y · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Manning v. American Airlines, 329 F.2d 32, 34 (2d Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817 , 85 S.Ct. 33 , 13 L.Ed.2d 29 (1964); Air Cargo, Inc., supra, at 247.
cited Cited "see" Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employes v. Rea Express, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Manning v. American Airlines, Inc., 221 F.Supp. 301 (S.D.N.Y.1963), aff’d., 329 F.2d 32 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817 , 85 S.Ct. 33 , 13 L.Ed.2d 29 (1964).
cited Cited "see" Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes, Afl-Cio v. Rea Express, Inc., Debtor, Rea Express, Inc., Debtor-In-Possession, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. Rea Express, Inc., Debtor, Rea Express, Inc., Debtor-In-Possession
2d Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Manning v. American Airlines, Inc., 221 F.Supp. 301 (S.D.N.Y.1963), Aff'd., 329 F.2d 32 (2d Cir.), Cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817 , 85 S.Ct. 33 , 13 L.Ed.2d 29 (1964).
discussed Cited "see" Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, Switchmen's Union of North America v. The Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Company, Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen v. The Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Company, the Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Company v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, the Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Company v. Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen, Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Bangor and Aroostook Railroad Company, Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Bangor and Aroostook Railroad Company v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. The Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Company, (Two Cases)
D.C. Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bangor & A.R.R. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen, 255 F.Supp. 476 (D.D.C.1966) 15 Compare Manning v. American Airlines, Inc., 329 F.2d 32, 34 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817 , 85 S.Ct. 33 , 13 L.Ed.2d 29 (1964).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad
D.C. Cir. · 1967 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Manning v. American Airlines, Inc., 329 F.2d 32, 34 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817 , 85 S.Ct. 33 , 13 L.Ed. 2d 29 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carrington
v.
Rash
No. 82.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1964.
379 U.S. 812
W. C. Peticolas for petitioner. Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Mary K. Wall, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent Carr.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 58%
Citer courts: District of Columbia (1)

Supreme Court of Texas. Certiorari granted.