green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.4 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pontchartrain State Bank v. Lybrand
there is no erie obligation when there is 'persuasive data that the highest court of the state would decide otherwise' than the intermediate appellate ... court.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bradford v. City of Shreveport
La.Civil Code art. 3499 (1825) (emphasis added). [8] See Dainow, Introductory Commentary to the Louisiana Civil Code, in 1 West's LSA-Civil Code 1, 12 (1952). [9] E. g., Sample v. Whitaker, 172 La. 722 , 135 So. 38 (1931); Straus v. City of New Orleans, 166 La. 1035 , 118 So. 125 (1928); Phelps v. Reinach, 38 La.Ann. 547 (1886); see Shelp v. National Surety Corp., 333 F.2d 431 (5th Cir.), cert. denied. 379 U.S. 945 , 85 S.Ct. 439 , 13 L.Ed.2d 543 (1964), noted in 39 Tul.L.Rev. 577 (1965). [10] In Ziemer , 620 members of the Fire Department of the City of New Orleans filed suit against the city…
discussed
Cited "see"
Norman Burris v. Golbal Bulk Carriers, Inc. v. Lavino Shipping Company, Third-Party-Defendant
(2×)
See Guarracino v. Luckenbach Steamship Co., 333 F.2d 646 , 648 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 946 , 85 S.Ct. 439 , 13 L.Ed.2d 543 (1964); Brown v. San Alberto CIA Armadora S.A., 305 F.2d 602, 603 (3d Cir. 1962); Rogers v. United States Lines Co., 303 F.2d 295, 298-299 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 876 , 83 S.Ct. 148 , 9 L.Ed.2d 114 (1962); Paliaga v. Luckenbach Steamship Co., 301 F.2d 403, 407-411 (2d Cir. 1962).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hill v. Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S. A.
See in accord Guarracino v. Luckenbach Steamship Co., Inc., 2 Cir., 1964, 333 F.2d 646 , cert. denied, 379 U.S. 946 , 85 S.Ct. 439 , 13 L.Ed.2d 543 , in which the court said: “Recovery over may be had even if the shipowner is exonerated from fault or unseaworthiness. * * * Potential liability is sufficient. * * * This rule would apply even if the unsafe conduct was that of the injured longshoreman alone. * * * This is as it should be, for it is the stevedore, in direct control of the hatch boss and the worker, who can best avoid the injury and expense by insistence on observance of safety pr…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hanna Mining Co.
v.
District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Association, AFL-CIO
v.
District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Association, AFL-CIO
No. 527.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 14, 1964.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Louisiana (1)
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief expressing the views of the United States.