Tutton v. United States, 167 Ct. Cl. 899 (SCOTUS 1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Tutton v. United States, 167 Ct. Cl. 899 (SCOTUS 1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “[I]t would be . . . inimical to allow a state rule postponing ‘accrual’ far beyond any necessities of the case to subject the United States to the stale claims which the prescription of the short two-year period was intended to avoid.”
66 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 22 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mary E. Fisk, Special Administratrix of the Estate of Clarence J. Fisk, Deceased v. United States (ca7, 1981-08-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Mary E. Fisk, Special Administratrix of the Estate of Clarence J. Fisk, Deceased v. United States
7th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
t would be . . . inimical to allow a state rule postponing 'accrual' far beyond any necessities of the case to subject the united states to the stale claims which the prescription of the short two-year period was intended to avoid.
cited Cited "see" Severtson v. United States
E.D. La. · 1992 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Kossick v. United States, 330 F.2d 933 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 837 , 85 S.Ct. 73 , 13 L.Ed.2d 44 (1964). 2 .
cited Cited "see" Schunk v. United States
E.D.N.Y · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kossick v. United States, 330 F.2d 933, 934-35 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 837 , 85 S.Ct. 73 , 13 L.Ed.2d 44 (1964). 17.
discussed Cited "see" Clark v. United States
S.D.N.Y. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
The Court noted that the “traditional purposes of statutes of limitations . . . require the assertion of claims within a specified period of time after notice of the invasion of legal rights.” The rule has been applied by the lower federal courts in cases brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act for alleged medical malpractice on the part of doctors employed by federally operated hospitals, Ciccarone v. *1094 United States, 486 F.2d 253, 256 (3d Cir. 1973); Toal v. United States, 438 F.2d 222, 225 (2d Cir. 1971); see Kossick v. United States, 330 F.2d 933, 936 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Dymm v. Cahill
S.D.N.Y. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Kossick v. United States, 330 F.2d 933, 936 (2d Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 837 , 85 S.Ct. 73 , 13 L.Ed.2d 44 (1964).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Floyd L. Wehrman v. United States
8th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Camire, supra n. 2 . 27 In Kossick v. United States, 330 F.2d 933 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 837 , 85 S.Ct. 73 , 13 L.Ed.2d 44 (1964), the Second Circuit recognized the dilemma of a patient in the process of treatment who feels something may be wrong, yet, because the treatment is not complete, does not give up hope of its eventual success: " 'It would be absurd to require a wronged patient to interrupt corrective efforts by serving a summons on the physician or hospital superintendent.' ... and this is not altogether without application when as here the summons would be served…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Group Health Inc. v. United States
S.D.N.Y. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Kossick v. United States, 330 F.2d 933, 935 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 837 , 85 S.Ct. 73 , 13 L.Ed.2d 44 (1964).
FRED S. TUTTON
v.
United States
No. 271-63.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1964.
167 Ct. Cl. 899
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 90%
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1)

Plaintiff’s petition for writ of certiorari to review the order of the Court of Claims dismissing plaintiff’s petition on May 1, 1964, was denied by the Supreme Court October 12, 1964.