green
Positive treatment
1.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "but see"
Hair v. Commissioner
But see, Wiseman v. Barby, 380 F.2d 121 (10th Cir. 1967), rev’d, 390 U.S. 339 , 88 S.Ct. 1097 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1218 (1968); Belknap v. United States, 278 F.Supp. 337 (W.D.Ky.1967).
cited
Cited "but see"
ca9 1968
But see, Wiseman v. Barby, 380 F.2d 121 (10th Cir. 1967), rev'd, 390 U.S. 339 , 88 S.Ct. 1097 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1218 (1968); Belknap v. United States, 278 F.Supp. 337 (W.D.Ky.1967)
cited
Cited "see"
Bollinger v. State
See People v. Jones, 62 Cal. Rptr. 304, 319 (Ct. App. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 980 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul R. White and Anna Lee White
See our recent ease on production payments, Wiseman v. Barby, 380 F.2d 121 (10th Cir.), rev’d 390 U.S. 339 , 88 S.Ct. 1097 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1218 . 3 .
Spigner
v.
California
v.
California
No. 910.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 11, 1968.
Burton Marks and Harvey A. Schneider for petitioner. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Edward H. Him, Jr., and Daniel J. Kremer, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.