green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States ex rel. Brooks v. Clifford
But see, Brown v. McNamara, 263 F.Supp. 686, 691 (D.N.J.), aff’d., 387 F.2d 150 (3 Cir. 1967), cert. den. sub nom., Brown v. Clifford, 390 U.S. 1005 , 88 S.Ct. 1244 , 20 L.Ed.2d 105 (1968), suggesting that such regulations are not required.
discussed
Cited "see"
Craycroft v. Ferrall
(2×)
See Brown v. McNamara, 263 F.Supp. 686, 692-693 (D.N.J.), affirmed 387 F.2d 150 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, Brown v. Clifford, 390 U.S. 1005 , 88 S.Ct. 1244 , 20 L.Ed.2d 105 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Peter Craycroft v. William E. Ferrall, Commandant, Thirteenth Naval District, Robert Strange McNamara as Secretary of Defense, and Robert H. v. Baldwin, as Acting Secretary of the Navy, or His Successor as Acting Secretary, or as Secretary of the Navy, Peter Craycroft v. Clark Clifford, Secretary of Defense, Paul Robert Ignatius, Secretary of the Navy, and H. J. Trum, Commandant, Thirteenth Naval District
(2×)
See Brown v. McNamara, 263 F.Supp. 686, 692-693 (D.N.J.), affirmed 387 F.2d 150 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, Brown v. Clifford, 390 U.S. 1005 , 88 S.Ct. 1244 , 20 L.Ed.2d 105 (1968).
examined
Cited "see"
No. 461
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Brown v. McNamara, 387 F.2d 150 , 153 n. 5 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, Brown v. Clifford, 390 U.S. 1005 , 88 S.Ct. 1244 , 20 L.Ed.2d 105 (1968) (noting, but not ruling upon, the instant contention).
examined
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Brown v. McNamara, 387 F.2d 150 , 153 n. 5 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, Brown v. Clifford, 390 U.S. 1005 , 88 S.Ct. 1244 , 20 L.Ed.2d 105 (1968) (noting, but not ruling upon, the instant contention).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States ex rel. Caputo v. Sharp
This legislative intent is borne out by the House Armed Services Committee Report, which evinces as its principal concern that of discouraging judicial review at a premature stage of the Selective Service process before the case would be properly ripe for challenge in the courts. 2 Thus, the new law seems merely a statutory restatement of the “existing law” handed down by the federal courts which, indeed, “precludes * * * judicial review” of draft board “classification action” except in two instances, viz.: after registrant has submitted for induction, on a petition for habeas corp…
examined
Cited "see"
Hammond v. Lenfest
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Brown v. McNamara, 387 F.2d 150 , 153 n. 5 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, Brown v. Clifford, 390 U.S. 1005 , 88 S.Ct. 1244 , 20 L.Ed.2d 105 (1968) (noting, but not ruling upon, the instant contention).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Laird
See, also, Brown v. Mc.namara (3d Cir. 1967) 387 F.2d 150 , cert. denied 390 U.S. 1005 , 88 S.Ct. 1244 , 20 L.Ed.2d 105 3 Cf. United States v. Wood (4th Cir. 1972) 454 F.2d 765, 767 , where, becuase of failure of registrant to state a prima facie case, it was held the Selective Service Board was under no duty to state reasons for denial of CO status, with United States v. Broyles (4th Cir. 1970) 423 F.2d 1299, 1303-1304 , where, because the registrant had set forth a prima facie case, a statement of reasons for denial was found to be compelled.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States ex rel. Coates v. Laird
See, also, Brown v. McNamara (3d Cir. 1967) 387 F. 2d 150 , cert, denied 390 U.S. 1005 , 88 S.Ct. 1244 , 20 L.Ed.2d 105 . .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cortright v. Resor
See, e. g., Brown v. McNamara, 263 F.Supp. 686 (D.N.J.), aff’d, 387 F.2d 150 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1005 , 88 S.Ct. 1244 , 20 L.Ed.2d 105 (1968); Noyd v. McNamara, 267 F.Supp. 701 (D.Colo.), aff’d, 378 F.2d 538 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1022 , 88 S.Ct. 593 , 19 L.Ed.2d 667 (1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brown
v.
Clifford, Secretary of Defense
v.
Clifford, Secretary of Defense
No. 1081.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 1, 1968.
Melvin L. Wulf, Emerson L. Darnell and Marvin M. Karpatkin for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Jerome M. Feit for respondents.
Douglas, Granted, Should.
Cited by 24 opinions | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.