green
Positive treatment
1.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
National Research Development Corp. v. Great Lakes Carbon Corp.
See, Corning Glass Works v. Anchor Hocking Glass Corp., 374 F.2d 473, 478-79 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 826 , 88 S.Ct. 65 , 19 L.Ed.2d 80 (1967); Merck & Co. v. Chase Chemical Co., 273 F.Supp. 68, 75-76 (D.N.J.1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Karl Ziegler, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
See Southern Saw Service, Inc. v. Pittsburgh-Erie Saw Corp., supra. Where the court is confronted with a pioneer patent, “liberality becomes the keynote of construction requiring the court to give the patentee a wide breadth of protection in construing the patent claims and specifications . . . . ” Corning Glass Works v. Anchor Hocking Glass Corp., 374 F.2d 473, 476 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 826 , 88 S.Ct. 65 , 19 L.Ed.2d 80 (1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
O'Brien
v.
Socony Mobil Oil Co. (successor to Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corp.)
v.
Socony Mobil Oil Co. (successor to Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corp.)
No. 248.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1967.
James F. X. O’Brien for petitioner., John S. Battle, Jr., for respondent.
Published
Sup. Ct. N. J. and/or Sup. Ct. App. Va. Certiorari denied.