green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Jakubowski
See Schatz, 943 F.2d at 491 (noting difference between professionals who make “affirmative misrepresentations” and professionals who simply “fail to tattle on their elient[s]”). *1082 Sixth, Jakubowski argues that he is not liable because he was “little more than a finder,” citing SEC v. Great American Industries, Inc., 407 F.2d 453 , 460-61 (2d Cir.1968), ce rt. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1770 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
People Ex Rel. VanMeveren v. District Court in & for the County of Larimer
(2×)
See People v. Ross, 41 Ill.2d 445 , 244 N.E.2d 608 (1969), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1771 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969). 5 Such construction comports with present day notions of security law, avoids hypertechnical results stemming from property concepts developed in a bygone era, and furthers legislative intent in extending the protection of the arson statute to property rights as well as the traditional right of occupancy or possession.
discussed
Cited "see"
Chiarella v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Pepper v. Litton, 308 U. S. 295, 307, n. 15 (1939). [11] See also SEC v. Great American Industries, Inc., 407 F. 2d 453, 460 (CA2 1968), cert. denied, 395 U. S. 920 (1969); Kohler v. Kohler Co., 319 F. 2d 634, 637-638 (CA7 1963); Note, 43 N. Y.
discussed
Cited "see"
George Pettus v. American Airlines, Inc.
See Young & Co. v. Shea, 397 F.2d 185 (5th Cir.), Rehearing denied, 404 F.2d 1059 (5th Cir. 1968), Cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1771 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969). 57 Since I believe that the District of Columbia was not precluded by full faith and credit, Res judicata or collateral estoppel from entertaining Pettus' claim, I would affirm the decision of the United States Department of Labor, Benefits Review Board.
cited
Cited "see"
Pettus v. American Airlines, Inc.
See Young & Co. v. Shea, 397 F.2d 185 (5th Cir.), rehearing denied, 404 F.2d 1059 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1771 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Newport News Shipbuilding And Dry Dock Company v. Director, Office Of Workers' Compensation Programs
See Young & Company v. Shea, 397 F.2d 185, 188-189 (5 Cir. 1968), Cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1771 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969); Strachan Shipping Company v. Shea, 276 F.Supp. 610, 612-614 (S.D.Tex.1967), Aff'd. per curiam, 406 F.2d 521 (5 Cir. 1969), Cert. denied, 395 U.S. 921 , 89 S.Ct. 1773 , 23 L.Ed.2d 238 (1969); Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, § 20, 33 U.S.C. § 920 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Director
See Young & Company v. Shea, 397 F.2d 185, 188-189 (5 Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1771 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969); Strachan Shipping Company v. Shea, 276 F.Supp. 610, 612-614 (S.D.Tex.1967), aff’d. per curiam, 406 F.2d 521 (5 Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 921 , 89 S.Ct. 1773 , 23 L.Ed.2d 238 (1969); Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, § 20, 33 U.S.C. § 920 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.
See Securities and Exchange Commission v. Great American Industries, Inc., 407 F.2d 453, 457 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1770 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tampa Ship Repair & Dry Dock Co., Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, and James M. Duran
Friend v. Britton, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 139 , 220 F.2d 820 , cert. denied, 350 U.S. 836 , 76 S.Ct. 72 , 100 L.Ed. 745 (1955); See Young & Co. v. Shea, 404 F.2d 1059 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1771 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Fireman's Fund Insurance Company and Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc. v. Robert H. Bergeron, Deputy Commissioner, United States Department of Labor
See Young and Co. v. Shea, 397 F.2d 185 (5th Cir. 1968), reh. denied, 404 F.2d 1059 , cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1771 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Feit v. Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corporation
See SEC v. Great American Industries, Inc., 407 F.2d 453, 459-460 (2d Cir. *570 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1770 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969); III L.
cited
Cited "see"
ca2 1970
See SEC v. Great American Industries, Inc., 407 F.2d 453, 456-458 (2d Cir. 1968) (in banc), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1770 , 23 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. North American Research & Development Corp.
See SEC v. Great American Industries, Inc., 407 F.2d 453, 456-458 (2d Cir. 1968) (in banc), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1770 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969); SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 401 F.2d 833 , 866 (Friendly, J., concurring), 869-870 (Hays, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (2d Cir. 1968) (in banc), cert. denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Savoy Industries, Inc. Appeal of S. Mort Zimmerman
See also SEC v. Great American Industries, Inc., 407 F.2d 453, 456-58 (2d Cir. 1968) (en banc), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1770 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities & Exchange Commission v. M. A. Lundy Associates
See also, S.E.C. v. Great American Industries, Inc., 407 F.2d 453 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1770 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969); S.E.C. v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 401 F.2d 833 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied 404 U.S. 1005 , 92 S.Ct. 561 , 30 L.Ed.2d 558 (1971); List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Semmes Motors, Inc., Suing on Behalf of Itself and Together With Ford Dealers Alliance, Inc., Etc. v. Ford Motor Company
Our recital has already demonstrated that scant heed was paid to our observations in SEC v. Frank, 388 F.2d 486, 490-492 (2 Cir. 1968); see also SEC v. Great American Industries, Inc., 407 F.2d 453 , 455 (2 Cir. 1968, in banc), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 1770 , 23 L.Ed.2d 237 (1969), concerning the undesirability of issuing temporary injunctions solely on the basis of affidavits, particularly in “cases where everything turns on what happened and that is in sharp dispute.” We recognize that this case differed from Frank in the greater urgency of Semmes’ need, and we would have …
Pagnani
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission Matusow v. Securities and Exchange Commission and Great American Industries, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange Commission
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission Matusow v. Securities and Exchange Commission and Great American Industries, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange Commission
No. 1185; No. 1186; No. 1195.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 26, 1969.
Robert D. Larsen for petitioner in No. 1185; Robert Kasanof for petitioner in No. 1186; and Simon H. Rifkind, Gerald D. Stern, and Thomas R. Farrell for petitioners in No. 1195., Solicitor General Griswold, Philip A. Loomis, Jr., Walter P. North, and Meyer Eisenberg for respondent in all three cases.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 407 F. 2d 453.