green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.8 score
“it was entirely appropriate for the district court to let the arbitrators explain whether they had interpreted the payment clause. this method commendably avoided any judicial guessing as to the meaning of the award.”
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
James R. Rosencrantz & Sons, Inc. v. John Deere Company
it was entirely appropriate for the district court to let the arbitrators explain whether they had interpreted the payment clause. this method commendably avoided any judicial guessing as to the meaning of the award.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Baskin
See North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 , 89 S.Ct. 258 , 21 L.Ed.2d 258 (1969); Green v. United States, 355 U.S. 184 , 78 S.Ct. 221 , 2 L.Ed.2d 199 (1957) United States v. Ball, 163 U.S. 662 , 16 S.Ct. 1192 , 41 L.Ed. 300 (1896).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 1547 v. City of Ketchikan
See also Galt v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co., 397 F.2d 439 (7th Cir.1968) (remanding an award for clarification is not a judicial invasion of the arbitrator’s province but rather serves to give the parties what they bargained for — a clear decision from the arbitrator), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 925 , 89 S.Ct. 258 , 21 L.Ed.2d 262 (1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
F. H. Sparks Co., Inc.
v.
George Sollitt Construction Co.
v.
George Sollitt Construction Co.
No. 411.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 28, 1968.
Albert E. Jenner, Jr., for respondent.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Francis X. Conway for petitioner.