Beeline Express, Inc. v. United States, 398 U.S. 955 (1970). · Go Syfert
Search
Beeline Express, Inc. v. United States, 398 U.S. 955 (1970). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
84 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 23 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: John Henry Knapp, Arizona State Prison Inmate No. 33659, and All Inmates of the Arizona State Prison Similarly Situated v. Harold Cardwell (ca9, 1982-01-19) · Strongest negative: Federal Election Commission v. Florida for Kennedy Committee (ca11, 1982-08-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Federal Election Commission v. Florida for Kennedy Committee (2×)
11th Cir. · 1982 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf. SEC v. Wall Street Transcript Corp., 422 F.2d 1371 , 1375, 1380-81 (2d Cir.) (question whether a publication is a “bona fide newspaper” exempt from the disclosure requirements of the Investment Advisors Act of 1940 is a question in the first instance for the agency), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 958 , 90 S.Ct. 2170 , 26 L.Ed.2d 542 (1970).
discussed Cited "see" John Henry Knapp, Arizona State Prison Inmate No. 33659, and All Inmates of the Arizona State Prison Similarly Situated v. Harold Cardwell (2×)
9th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Watermeier v. Louisiana Stadium and Exposition District, 308 F.Supp. 273, 277-78 (E.D.La.1969), aff’d mem., 398 U.S. 955 , 90 S.Ct. 2172 , 26 L.Ed.2d 539 (1970).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." AVCO Financial Corp. v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
S.D.N.Y. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also SEC v. Wall Street Transcript Corp., 422 F.2d 1371 , 1375 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 958 , 90 S.Ct. 2170 , 26 L.Ed.2d 542 (1970) (citing Oklahoma Press Pub.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Beeline Express, Inc.
v.
United States
No. 1456.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 15, 1970.
398 U.S. 955
Cited by 33 opinions  |  Published

Appeal from D. C., Colo. Judgment affirmed.