green
Positive treatment
1.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
(2×)
See Chavis v. Whitcomb, 305 F.Supp. 1364 (S.D.Ind.1969), stay granted 396 U.S. 1055 , 90 S.Ct. 748 , 24 L.Ed.2d 757 , stay continued 396 U.S. 1064 , 90 S.Ct. 761 , 25 L.Ed.2d 82 (1970); Maryland Citizens for Representative General Assembly et al. v. Governor of Maryland et al., 4 Cir., 429 F.2d 606 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Knox v. Milwaukee County Board of Elections Commissioners
See also Whitcomb v. Chavis, 396 U.S. 1055 , 90 S.Ct. 748 , 24 L.Ed.2d 757 (1970), and 396 U.S. 1064, 1065 , 90 S.Ct. 761 , 762, 24 L.Ed.2d 757 (1970) (Douglas, J., dissenting) (by granting stay of judgment pending appeal, Court “forced the respondents to go through the [state legislative] election under the ... scheme ... held unconstitutional by the District Court”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
School District of Greenville County, South Carolina
v.
Whittenberg
v.
Whittenberg
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 6, 1970.
J. Covington Parham, Jr., and C. Thomas Wyclie for applicants.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Application for temporary stay presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, denied.