green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Nos. 71-1499, 71-1521. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
But see Licata v. United States, 429 F.2d 1177 (9th Cir.), vacated as moot, 400 U.S. 938 , 91 S.Ct. 239 , 27 L.Ed.2d 243 (1970) The crimes itemized in Sec. 2514-the immunity statute at issue here-are all of the offenses listed in Sec. 2516 and violations of the wiretapping provisions of the 1968 Act. 39 See p. 1241 supra 40 18 U.S.C., Sec. 2101 (1970) 41 Of the offenses under investigation by the grand jury, only a violation of 18 U.S.C.
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Violations of 18 U.S.C. Sections 231, 241, 245, 371, 1361, 2101, 2102
But see Licata v. United States, 429 F.2d 1177 (9th Cir.), vacated as moot, 400 U.S. 938 , 91 S.Ct. 239 , 27 L.Ed.2d 243 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Martorano
(2×)
See Licata v. United States, 429 F.2d 1177, 1180 (9th Cir.), vacated as moot, 400 U.S. 938 , 91 S.Ct. 239 , 27 L.Ed.2d 243 (1970); see generally Commonwealth v. Clair, 458 Pa. 418 , 326 A.2d 272 (1974); Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co., 457 Pa. 255 , 322 A.2d 114 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lee Weinberg, United States of America v. David Alfred Scheffler, United States of America v. Teri Ann Volpin, United States of America v. Karen Duncan, United States of America v. Pamela Donaldson
See Licata v. United States, 429 F.2d 1177, 1180 (9th Cir. 1970), vacated as moot, 400 U. S. 938 , 91 S.Ct. 239 , 27 L.Ed.2d 243 . 4 The same considerations which justify the holding of civil contempt proceedings, absent the safeguards of indictment and jury (Shillitani v. United States, 384 U.S. 364, 371 , 86 S.Ct. 1531 , 16 L.Ed.2d 622 (1966)), warrant reasonable expedition of such proceedings both in the district court and on appeal. 10 All of the appellants assert that they were deprived of their rights under the Due Process Clause and Rule 6(d), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, because t…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Weinberg
See Licata v. United States, 429 F.2d 1177, 1180 (9th Cir. 1970), vacated as moot, 400 U. S. 938 , 91 S.Ct. 239 , 27 L.Ed.2d 243 . 4 The same considerations which justify the holding of civil contempt proeeedings, absent the safeguards of indictment and jury (Shillitani v. United States, 384 U.S. 364, 371 , 86 S.Ct. 1531 , 16 L.Ed.2d 622 (1966)), warrant reasonable expedition of such proceedings both in the district court and on appeal.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lemon
v.
Kurtzman, Superintendent of Public Instruction of Pennsylvania
v.
Kurtzman, Superintendent of Public Instruction of Pennsylvania
No. 89.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 7, 1970.
Cited by 12 opinions | Published
Appeal from D. C. E. D. Pa. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 397 U. S. 1034.] Motions of appellees schools and Pennsylvania Association of Independent Schools for additional time for oral argument denied.