green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
People v. Hobson
It was not a string of happenstances (see People v Lopez, 28 NY2d 23, 26-28 [dissenting opn], cert den 404 US 840 , supra, for a detailed analysis of the development of the right to counsel in this State; but see, in contrast, People v Robles, 27 NY2d 155, 158-160 , cert den 401 US 945 , supra).
discussed
Cited "see"
Foster v. State
(2×)
See Butler v. Southern Pacific Company, 431 F.2d 77, 79-80 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 945 , 91 S.Ct. 1196 , 28 L.Ed.2d 325 (1971); United States v. Barbati, 284 F.Supp. 409, 411-412 (E.D.N.Y. 1968); People v. Interest of W.C.L., 650 P.2d 1302, 1304-1305 (Colo.App. 1982); State v. Letterman, 47 Or.App. 1145 , 616 P.2d 505, 508-509 , 12 A.L.R.4th 1009 (1980), aff'd 291 Or. 3 , 627 P.2d 484 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Porter
See Byrd v. Comstock, 430 F.2d 937 (9th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 945 , 91 S.Ct. 960 , 28 L.Ed.2d 228 ; United States v. Bruton, 416 F.2d 310 (8th Cir. 1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James F. Bolden, United States of America v. George E. Jones
See United States v. Clemons, 142 U.S. App.D.C. 177, 440 F.2d 205, 207-09 (1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 945 , 91 S.Ct. 959 , 28 L.Ed.2d 227 (1971); United States v. Marshall, 142 U.S.App.D.C. 167 , 440 F.2d 195, 198-99 , cert. denied, 400 U.S. 909 , 91 S.Ct. 153 , 27 L.Ed.2d 148 (1970); cf. Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
George Moran v. Marvin Hogan
See United States v. Rubin, 433 F.2d 442 , 444-445 (5th Cir. 1970), cert, denied, 401 U.S. 945 , 91 S.Ct. 961 , 28 L.Ed.2d 228 (1971). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Hawkins
(2×)
See also, People v. Robles, 27 N.Y. 2d 155 , 263 N.E. 2d 304 (1970), cert. denied 401 U.S. 945 (1971), where the Court of Appeals of New York said that, “The assertion that once an attorney appears there can be no effective waiver unless made ‘in the presence of an attorney’ is merely a theoretical statement of the rule. . . .
Fletcher
v.
Brierley, Correctional Superintendent
v.
Brierley, Correctional Superintendent
No. 6320.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 1, 1971.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.