discussed Cited "see" Durkay v. Madco Oil Co., Inc. See Bradford v. Thompson, 470 S.W.2d 638, 636 (Tex.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1174 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972) and Slaughter v. Qualls, 162 S.W.2d 671, 675 (Tex.1942) (foreclosure sale void when note not in default at that time); McLaren v. Jones, 89 Tex. 131 , 33 S.W. 849, 850 (1896) (sale not held on first Tuesday of month is void); Pentad Joint Venture v. First Nat’l Bank of La Grange, 797 S.W.2d 92, 96 (Tex.App.—Austin 1990, writ denied) and Jinkins v. Chambers, 622 S.W.2d 614, 615 (Tex.App.—Tyler 1981, no writ) (irregularity in sale causing grossly inadequate price ren…

cited Cited "see" Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. DSC OF NEWARK ENTER., INC. See Bradford v. Thompson, 460 S.W.2d 932 (Tex. Civ.App. 1970), reversed in part on other grounds, 470 S.W.2d 633 (Tex. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1174 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Orca Assets, G.P., L.L.C. v. Dorfman Cf. Poag v. Flories, 317 S.W.3d 820, 825 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2010, pet. denied) (“A void deed is without vitality , or legal effect.”); see also Bradford v. Thompson, 470 S.W.2d 633, 635 , 637' (Tex. 1971) (concluding that'a foreclosure was “null and void” and therefore declaring that a trustee’s deed arising from the foreclosure was “cancelled and held for náught”), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1174 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972); Black’s Law Dictionary 1805 (defining void to mean “[o]f no legal effect” or “null”).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Grynberg Production Corp. v. British Gas, P.L.C. Eagle Properties, Ltd. v. Scharbauer, 807 S.W.2d 714, 723 (Tex.1990); see also, Bradford v. Thompson, 460 S.W.2d 932, 936 (Tex.Civ.App.—Tyler 1970) (reliance in a fraud case can manifest itself as entering into a contract or otherwise acting to one’s hurt), rev’d on other grounds, 470 S.W.2d 633 (Tex.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1174 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972). 5.