green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Greifinger
See Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F.2d 178, 208 (2d Cir.1971) (Feinberg, J., dissenting in part and concurring in part) (“the means used to exact submission must be constitutionally acceptable, and the threat of virtually endless isolation that endangers sanity is not”), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1049 , 92 S.Ct. 719 , 30 L.Ed.2d 740 , cert. denied, 405 U.S. 978 , 92 S.Ct. 1190 , 31 L.Ed.2d 254 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
H.C. ex rel. Hewett v. Jarrard
See Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F.2d 178 , 205 n. 52 (2d Cir.1971) (en banc) (award of $25 per day for wrongful prison segregation not unreasonable), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 978 , 92 S.Ct. 1190 , 31 L.Ed.2d 254 (1972); Pino v. Dalshiem, 605 F.Supp. 1305 (S.D.N.Y.1984); O’Connor v. Keller, 510 F.Supp. 1359, 1375 (D.Md.1981) (award of $100 per day for wrongful isolation).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hewett v. Jarrard
See Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F.2d 178 , 205 n. 52 (2d Cir.1971) (en banc) (award of $25 per day for wrongful prison segregation not unreasonable), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 978 , 92 S.Ct. 1190 , 31 L.Ed.2d 254 (1972); Pino v. Dalshiem, 605 F.Supp. 1305 (S.D.N.Y.1984); O'Connor v. Keller, 510 F.Supp. 1359, 1375 (D.Md.1981) (award of $100 per day for wrongful isolation).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
We there expressed our views that "First Amendment rights to hold and express beliefs and receive information are entitled to 'special solicitude.' " Id. at 224 (citing Newkirk v. Butler, 364 F.Supp. 497, 501 (S.D.N.Y.1973), aff'd, 499 F.2d 1214 (2d Cir.1974), vacated as moot and dismissed sub nom., Preiser v. Newkirk, 422 U.S. 395 , 95 S.Ct. 2330 , 45 L.Ed.2d 272 (1975)); see Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F.2d 178, 189 (2d Cir.1971) (en banc), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 978 , 92 S.Ct. 1190 , 31 L.Ed.2d 254 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wali v. Coughlin
We there expressed our views that “First Amendment rights to hold and express beliefs and receive information are entitled to ‘special solicitude.’ ” Id. at 224 (citing Newkirk v. Butler, 364 F.Supp. 497, 501 (S.D.N.Y.1973), aff'd, 499 F.2d 1214 (2d Cir.1974), vacated as moot and dismissed sub nom., Preiser v. Newkirk, 422 U.S. 395 , 95 S.Ct. 2330 , 45 L.Ed.2d 272 (1975)); see Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F.2d 178, 189 (2d Cir.1971) (en banc), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 978 , 92 S.Ct. 1190 , 31 L.Ed.2d 254 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Victor Bono v. William Saxbe, Individually and in His Capacity as Attorney General of the United States
See Sweet, supra, 529 F.2d 854 , 860-866 and Sostre v. McGin-nis, 442 F.2d 178 (2nd Cir. 1971) (en banc), cert denied, 404 U.S. 1049 , 92 S.Ct. 719 , 30 L.Ed.2d 740 (1972) and 405 U.S. 978 , 92 S.Ct. 1190 , 31 L.Ed.2d 254 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Masia A. Mukmuk, Also Known as Sylvester Cholmondeley v. Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services
See Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F.2d 178, 202-03 (2 Cir. 1971) (en banc), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1049 , 92 S.Ct. 719 , 30 L.Ed.2d 740 , 405 U.S. 978 , 92 S.Ct. 1190 , 31 L.Ed.2d 254 (1972); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States ex rel. Haymes v. Montanye
See Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F.2d 178 , 202 & n.47 (2d Cir. 1971) (en banc), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1049 , 92 S.Ct. 719 , 30 L.Ed.2d 740 and 405 U.S. 978 , 92 S.Ct. 1190 , 31 L.Ed.2d 254 (1972); Johnson v. Avery, 393 U.S. 483, 488 , 89 S.Ct. 747 , 21 L.Ed.2d 718 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Montanye
See Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F.2d 178 , 202 & n.47 (2d Cir. 1971) (enbanc), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1049 , 92 S.Ct. 719 , 30 L.Ed.2d 740 and 405 U.S. 978 , 92 S.Ct. 1190 , 31 L.Ed.2d 254 (1972); Johnson v. Avery, 393 U.S. 483, 488 , 89 S.Ct. 747 , 21 L.Ed.2d 718 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph R. Fiore
See Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F.2d 178, 206, 207 (2d Cir. 1971) (en banc), cert. denied, Oswald v. Sostre, 405 U.S. 978 , 92 S.Ct. 1190 , 31 L.Ed.2d 254 (1972). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Dreyer v. Jalet
See Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F.2d 178 (2d Cir.1971), *481 cert. denied sub nom., Oswald v. Sostre, 405 U.S. 978 , 92 S.Ct. 1190 , 31 L.Ed.2d 254 (1972); Clutchette v. Procunier, 328 F.Supp. 767 (N.D.Cal.1971); Morris v. Travisono, 310 F.Supp. 857 (D.R.I.1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nevin Mawhinney v. Robert J. Henderson, Superintendent, Peter Preiser, Commissioner of Corrections, and Norris, Lieutenant
See also Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F.2d 178, 189 (2 Cir. 1971) (en banc), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1049 , 92 S.Ct. 719 , 30 L.Ed.2d 740 , and 405 U.S. 978 , 92 S.Ct. 1190 , 31 L.Ed.2d 254 (1972) (confinement to segregation for past or threatened litigation against prison officials constituted due process violation).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Zachary Morgan v. Edwin J. Lavallee, Warden
See also Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F.2d 178, 189 (2d Cir. 1971) (en banc), cert. denied sub nom., Oswald v. Sostre, 405 U.S. 978 , 92 S.Ct. 1190 , 31 L.Ed.2d 254 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
James Harvey Johnson v. Warden Noah Alldredge and Corrections Officer Cronrath
See, e. g., Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F.2d 178 (2d Cir. 1971) (en banc), cert. denied sub nom., Oswald v. Sostre, 405 U.S. 978 , 92 S.Ct. 1190 , 31 L.Ed.2d 254 (1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hamilton
v.
California
v.
California
No. 71-548.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 6, 1972.
Douglas, Granted, Should.
Published
App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Alameda. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.