green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Janasiewicz v. BOARD OF EDUC., ETC.
But see, Idaho Code § 33-1501 (ruled unconstitutional as applied to private school students, Epeldi v. Engelking, 94 Idaho 390 , 488 P.2d 860 (1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972)); Mo.Ann.Stat. § 167.231 (Vernon) (constitutional even though it applies only to public school students, Luetkemeyer v. Kaufmann, 364 F.Supp. 376 (W.D.Mo.1973), affirmed, 419 U.S. 888 , 95 S.Ct. 167 , 42 L.Ed.2d 134 (1974)).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Reed v. Airtran Airways
he relationship between an employee and his working environment is of such significance as to be entitled to statutory protection.
discussed
Cited "see"
Tillery v. ATSI, INC.
See id. at 975 (observing that, “as Meritor itself reveals, the federal courts have been applying hostile environment principles to harassment based on race, religion, and national origin as well as sex in the twenty-five years since the Fifth Circuit’s ground breaking decision in Rogers v. E.E.O.C., 454 F.2d 234 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Kreate v. Disabled American Veterans
Accord, Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F.2d 234 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Hogan v. Henderson
See Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F.2d 234, 238 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin v. Kroger Co.
In short, “[t]he mere utterance of a racial epithet is not indicia of discrimination under Title VII.” Boyd, 158 F.3d at 329 (citing Anderson, 26 F.3d at 1295 ); see Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F.2d 234, 238 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972) (“mere utterance of an .ethnic or racial epithet which engenders offensive feelings in an employee” does not fall within the proscription of Title VII).
discussed
Cited "see"
Albert ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee
(2×)
See Faragher, — U.S. at -, 118 S.Ct. at 2283 (quoting Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F.2d 234, 238 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972)); Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 21 , 114 S.Ct. 367 , 126 L.Ed.2d 295 (1993) (same); Meritor Savings Bank, 477 U.S. at 67 , 106 S.Ct. 2399 (same); see also Erebia v. Chrysler Plastic Prods.
cited
Cited "see"
Garvey Elevators, Inc. v. Kansas Human Rights Commission
Accord Rogers v. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n, 454 F.2d 234, 238 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S. Ct. 2058 , 32 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Metcalf v. Metropolitan Life, Inc.
See Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F.2d 234 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Barnes v. Breeden
See Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F.2d 234 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.
See Rogers v. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm 'n, 454 F.2d 234 (5th Cir.1971), cert, denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972). [Hicks v. Gates Rubber Company, 833 F.2d 1406, 1416 (10th Cir.1987).] Accord Hall v. Gus Constr., 842 F. 2d 1010, 1015 (8th Cir.1988) (“Although [the plaintiff] was not subjected to sexual propositions and offensive touching, evidence of sexual harassment directed at employees other than the plaintiff is relevant to show a hostile work environment.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nancy O'Mara Ezold, at No. 91-1780 v. Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, at No. 91-1741
For hostile environment to be actionable under Meritor, it must be sufficiently severe or pervasive "to alter the conditions of [the plaintiff’s] employment and create an abusive working environment." Id. at 67 , 106 S.Ct. at 2405 (quotation omitted); see abo Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F.2d 234, 238 (5th Cir.1971) ("mere utterance of an ethnic or racial epithet which engenders offensive feelings in an employee” would not sufficiently affect conditions of employment to violate Title VII), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972); Fox v. Ravinia Club, Inc., 761 F.Supp. 797…
cited
Cited "see"
Raymond Woods, Jr. v. Graphic Communications Union Local 747/printing Specialties Local Union 380
See Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F.2d 234, 238 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Payne v. General Motors Corp.
Accord Rogers v. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n, 454 F.2d 234, 238 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Joyce Wyerick v. Bayou Steel Corporation
See Meritor, 477 U.S. at 66 , 106 S.Ct. at 2405 (citing Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F.2d 234, 238 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972)). 11 V.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Laser Arms Corp. Securities Litigation
See Quinn & Co. v. SEC, 452 F.2d 943, 947 (10th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2059 , 32 L.Ed.2d 344 (1972).
examined
Cited "see"
Marguerite Hicks v. The Gates Rubber Company
(4×)
Accord Rogers v. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm'n, 454 F.2d 234, 238 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Shell Oil Co.
(2×)
See Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F. 2d 234, 239 (CA5 1971), cert. denied, 406 U. S. 957 (1972); Graniteville Co. (Sibley Division) v. EEOC, 438 F. 2d 32, 37-38 (CA4 1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ferguson v. EI duPont De Nemours and Co., Inc.
See Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F.2d 234, 238 (5th Cir. 1971) (“mere utterance of an ethnic or racial epithet which engenders offensive feelings in an employee” not actionable), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca11 1982
See Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F.2d 234, 238 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972); Calcote v. Texas Education Foundation, Inc., 458 F.Supp. 231, 237 (W.D.Tex.1976), aff'd, 578 F.2d 95 (5th Cir. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walker v. Ford Motor Co.
See Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F.2d 234, 238 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972); Calcote v. Texas Education Foundation, Inc., 458 F.Supp. 231, 237 (W.D.Tex.1976), aff’d, 578 F.2d 95 (5th Cir. 1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Carol QUIJANO Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNIVERSITY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Defendant-Appellee
Accord, Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F.2d 234 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
James G. CARIDDI, Appellant, v. KANSAS CITY CHIEFS FOOTBALL CLUB, INC., and Robert M. Wachter, Appellees
See Rogers v. Equal Employment Opportunity Com’n, 454 F.2d 234, 238 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
ca5 1972
See Rogers v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 5 Cir., 1971, 454 F.2d 234 , cert. denied, 1972, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972)
cited
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rogers Bros.
See Rogers v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 5 Cir., 1971, 454 F.2d 234 , cert. denied, 1972, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Patino v. Birken Mfg. Co.
In Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57, 64 , 106 S.Ct. 2399 , 91 L.Ed.2d 49 (1986), the United States Supreme Court examined the legislature's use of the phrase "terms, conditions, or privileges of employment" in Title VII, and declared that it evinced a congressional intent "to strike at the entire spectrum of disparate treatment of men and women in employment." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) The court concluded that "a plaintiff may establish a violation of Title VII by proving that discrimination based on sex has created a hostile or abusive work environment." Id., at 66 , 106 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zenni v. Hard Rock Cafe International, Inc.
Cf. Snell v. Suffolk County, 782 F.2d 1094, 1102-03 (2d Cir.1986) (proliferation of demeaning literature and epithets were sufficiently continuous and pervasive to establish a hostile work environment); see also Vaughn v. Pool Offshore Co., etc., 683 F.2d 922, 924 (5th Cir.1982) (“[A] discriminatory and offensive work environment, ‘so heavily polluted with discrimination as to destroy completely the emotional and psychological stability of minority group workers,’ in itself may constitute a violation of Title VII.”) (quoting Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F.2d 234, 238 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denie…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cota v. Tucson Police Department
See also Rogers v. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n, 454 F.2d 234, 238 (5th Cir.1971) (an employer’s mere utterance of an ethnic or racial epithet that engenders offensive feelings in an employee does not automatically fall within the proscription of Title VII), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972); Stallcop v. Kaiser Found.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fernando C. HARVEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thorne BLAKE, Defendant-Appellant
See, e.g., Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F.2d 234, 238 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972); Quijano v. University Federal Credit Union, 617 F.2d 129, 131 (5th Cir.1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Broderick v. Ruder
See also Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F.2d 234 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , *1278 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Snell v. Suffolk County
Racial Hostility It is well settled that a “working environment dominated by racial hostility and harassment constitutes a violation of Title VII, regardless of any other tangible job detriment to minority employees.” Gilbert v. City of Little Rock, 722 F.2d 1390, 1394 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2347 , 80 L.Ed.2d 820 (1984); see also Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F.2d 234, 238 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972). 1.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zabkowicz v. West Bend Co.
Henson v. Dundee, 682 F.2d 897 (11th Cir.1982); Bundy v. Jackson, 641 F.2d 934 (D.C.Cir.1981); See also Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F.2d 234 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 *784 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bailey v. Binyon
See also Rogers v. E.E.O.C., 454 F.2d 234, 238 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2058 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972). 7 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mayflower Securities Co. v. Bureau of Securities
See e. g., Quinn and Company v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 452 F. 2d 943 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. den. 406 U. S. 957 , 92 S. Ct. 2059 , 32 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fidell v. Board of Elections of City of New York
See also Rosario v. Rockefeller, 458 F.2d 649 , at 652 and n. 4 (2d Cir. April 7, 1972), cert. granted, 406 U.S. 957 , 92 S.Ct. 2062 , 32 L.Ed.2d 343 (1972) (statute upheld under compelling interest standard).
Rosario
v.
Rockefeller, Governor of New York
v.
Rockefeller, Governor of New York
No. 71-1371.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 30, 1972.
Application, Brennan, Consideration, Denied, Douglas, Grant, Marshall, Merits, Presented, Referred, Stay, Stewart.
Published
Citer courts: D. Maryland (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of Lawyers for McGovern for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari granted. Motion for summary reversal or, in the alternative, for expedited consideration on the merits denied.
Mr. Justice Stewart would expedite consideration on the merits. Application for stay, presented to Mr. Justice Marshall, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice Marshall would grant the stay.