green
Positive treatment
10.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Commonwealth v. Bestwick
In Commonwealth v. McCloskey, 443 Pa. 117 , 137 n. 26, 277 A.2d 764 , 774 n. 26, cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1000 , 92 S.Ct. at 559, 560, 563, 30 L.Ed.2d 552 (1971), we stated: “It has been suggested that the minimum requisites for obtaining a grand jury are: (a) the subject matter of the investigation must affect members of the community as a whole, rather than as individuals; (b) the investigation must be aimed at conditions and not primarily at individuals; (c) the ordinary processes of the law must be inadequate to cope with the problems; (d) the investigation must have a defined scope, be ai…
discussed
Cited "see"
Rotblut v. BEN HUR MOVING AND STORAGE, INC.
(2×)
See Colligan v. Activities Club of N.Y., Ltd., 442 F.2d 686 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971); Bangkok Crafts Corp. v. Capitolo di San Pietro in Vaticano, No. 03 Civ. 0015, 2005 WL 1595285 , at *5 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see"
Conte Bros. Automotive, Inc. v. Quaker State-Slick 50, Inc.
(2×)
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686 (2d Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971); Barrus v. Sylvania, 55 F.3d 468 (9th Cir.1995) (same); Dovenmuehle v. Gilldorn Mortgage Midwest Corp., 871 F.2d 697 (7th Cir.1989) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
No. 98-5136
(2×)
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686 (2d Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971); Barrus v. Sylvania, 55 F.3d 468 (9th Cir.1995) (same); Dovenmuehle v. Gilldorn Mortgage Midwest Corp., 871 F.2d 697 (7th Cir.1989) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hernan RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellee
(2×)
See United States v. Bacall, 443 F.2d 1050, 1056 (9th Cir.) (it’s “crucial to a determination of taint” that police didn’t suspect the defendant of the crime for which their illegal activity produced evidence), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 565 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971); Durham v. United States, 403 F.2d 190, 196 (9th Cir.1968) (“The price is too high and the advantage too uncertain to make it reasonable to suppose that law enforcement officers will be encouraged to indulge in unlawful searches, knowing that what they find will be suppressed, in the hope of obtaining admissibl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Sara G. Serbin and George Baker, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Ziebart International Corporation, Inc. And Ziebart Corporation, Sheilah Guarino v. Sun Company, Inc., Sun Refining & Marketing Company, Robert McClements Jr., David Zebley and Wells, Rich, and Greene, Inc.
(2×)
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686, 692 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Serbin v. Ziebart International Corp.
(2×)
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686, 692 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
West Indian Sea Island Cotton Ass'n v. Threadtex, Inc.
(2×)
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686, 692 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shonac Corp. v. AMKO International, Inc.
(2×)
Although the legislative history of the Lanham Act is fairly extensive, the history *926 of § 43 is very limited, and “[congressional hearings and committee reports contain little which would add to the understanding of the specific scope or purpose of Section 43(a).” Bauer, A Federal Law of Unfair Competition: What should Be The Reach of § 43(a) of the Lanham Act?, 31 UCLA L.Rev. 671, 680 (1984); accord Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686, 689-90 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Richardson-Vicks, Inc.
(2×)
See Colli-gan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686 , 692 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bear Creek Productions, Inc. v. Saleh
(2×)
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686, 692 (2d Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971); In re “Agent Orange”Product Liability Litigation, 475 F.Supp. 928, 934 (E.D.N.Y.1979). 17 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Camel Hair and Cashmere Institute of America, Inc. v. Associated Dry Goods Corporation, D/B/A Lord & Taylor
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686, 692 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971); Smith v. Montoro, 648 F.2d 602, 607 (9th Cir.1981); Thorn v. Reliance Van Co., Inc., 736 F.2d 929, 933 (3rd Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thompson Medical Company, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc.
(2×)
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971) (Section 43(a)'s grant of standing to "any person who believes that he is or is likely to be damaged” does not extend to consumers). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bolin
See Kansas City v. Henderson, 468 S.W.2d 48, 53-54 (Mo.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 570 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Springs Mills, Inc. v. Ultracashmere House, Ltd.
(2×)
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686, 692 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971) (denying a right of action to consumers under Section 1125(a)). 28 There are two bases for liability under Section 1125(a): false description and false association.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeffrey Thomas Schmidt, United States of America v. Donald Joseph Schmidt, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Bacall, 443 F.2d 1050, 1057 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 565 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ali Asghar Taheri
See the discussion in United States v. Bacall, 443 F.2d 1050 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 565 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971), in which a later investigation uncovered separate evidence of a different crime.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pennwalt Corp. v. Plough, Inc.
(2×)
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686, 692-94 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Broughton
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. McCloskey, 443 Pa. 117 , 277 A.2d 764 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1000 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 552 (1971); Special Grand Jury Case, 397 Pa. 254 , 154 A.2d 592 (1959); McNair's Petition, 324 Pa. 48 , 187 A. 498 (1936); Grand Jury Investigation of Western State Penitentiary, 173 Pa.Super. 197 , 96 A.2d 189 (1953).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cecil Dwayne Evans, Arnold Gene Tate, and Charles Edward Gent, Jr.
See United States v. Bacall, 443 F.2d 1050 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 565 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971); Lawton v. Dacey, 352 F.2d 61 (1st Cir. 1965). *489 Appellant Gent also complains that the government should have been barred from introducing the daytimers, because he was not provided with copies of them prior to trial.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. A. C. Pacee
See United States v. Bacall, 443 F.2d 1050, 1055-57 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 565 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Barger
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. McCloskey, 443 Pa. 117, 130-31 , 277 A.2d 764, 771 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1000 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 552 (1971) for a listing of the other exceptional methods by which criminal prosecutions can be commenced in Pennsylvania. 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Eugene Hickman, United States of America v. Thomas Henry Landers
(2×)
See United States v. Bacall, 443 F.2d 1050, 1056-57 (9th Cir.), Cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 565 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Noone v. Banner Talent Associates, Inc.
(2×)
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686 , 691-92 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971); Nor *263 man M.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul Garcia, Jr., T/n, Jose Martinez-Lopez
Allen v. Cupp, supra, 426 F.2d at 759 ; see United States v. Bacall, 443 F.2d 1050, 1057 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 565 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Seven-Up Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.
(2×)
See also Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686, 692 (2d Cir.) (“The Act's purpose, as defined in § 45, is exclusively to protect the interests of a purely commercial class against unscrupulous commercial conduct.”), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
210 East 86th Street Corp. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Colligan v. Activities Club, 442 F.2d 686 , 692-93 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971). 3 .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Castrol Inc. v. Pennzoil Company and Pennzoil Products Company
(4×)
Instead, the statute provides a private remedy to a commercial plaintiff who meets the burden of proving that its commercial interests have been harmed by a competitor’s false advertising.” Id. at 230 (citations omitted); see also Colligan v. Activities Club, 442 F.2d 686 , 692 (2d Cir.1971) (“The Act’s purpose, as defined in § 45, is exclusively to protect the interests of a purely commercial class against unscrupulous commercial conduct.”), cer t. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971); Joseph P. Bauer, A Federal Law of Unfair Competition: What Should be the …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tracy v. Skate Key, Inc.
(2×)
Compare Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, 442 F.2d 686 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971) (consumers have no standing to allege Lanham Act violations) with Smith v. Montoro, 648 F.2d 602, 608 (9th Cir.1981) (movie actor whose name was replaced on list of credits for movie has standing); see also 1A Call-mann, Unfair Competition, Trademarks and Monopolies, § 5.04 at 23 (4th Ed. and 1988 supp.); Murray v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 844 F.2d 988, 995 (2nd Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Misurelli v. City of Racine
Compare La Rue v. California, 326 F.Supp. 348 (C.D.Cal.1971), probable jurisdiction noted 404 U.S. 999 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 551 with Paladino v. City of Omaha, 335 F.Supp. 897 (D.Neb.1972), and Hodges v. Fitle, 332 F.Supp. 504 (D.Neb.1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Misurelli v. City of Racine
Compare La Rue v. California, 326 F.Supp. 348 (C.D.Cal.1971), probable jurisdiction noted 404 U.S. 999 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 551 with Paladino v. City of Omaha, 335 F.Supp. 897 (D.Neb.1972), and Hodges v. Fitle, 332 F.Supp. 504 (D.Neb.1971).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Colligan
v.
Activities Club of New York, Ltd., Aka New York Winter Ski Club
v.
Activities Club of New York, Ltd., Aka New York Winter Ski Club
No. 71-141.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 20, 1971.
Are, Douglas, Granted, Should.
Cited by 136 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.