green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1986 ·
…we do not believe that the wilfulness element requires that the defendant actually intends to carry out the threat
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. David L. Hoffman
(2×)
we do not believe that the wilfulness element requires that the defendant actually intends to carry out the threat
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth Harold Smith
(2×)
See United States v. Hart, 457 F.2d 1087 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 861 , 93 S.Ct. 150 , 34 L.Ed.2d 108 (1972); Michaud v. United States, 350 F.2d 131 (10th Cir. 1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Michael Welch
Compare Roy v. United States, 416 F.2d 874, 877-78 (9th Cir.1969) (threatening statement is willful if a reasonable person should foresee that the hearers would take the statement seriously), and United States v. Hart, 457 F.2d 1087, 1090-91 (10th Cir.), cert, denied, 409 U.S. 861 , 93 S.Ct. 150 , 34 L.Ed.2d 108 (1972) (same), with United States v. Patillo, 431 F.2d 293 (4th Cir. 1970), panel opinion adhered to, 438 F.2d 13 (4th Cir.1971) (en banc) (threat against the President violates statute only if speaker either possesses actual intention to carry it out or communicates it in a manner ten…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Ex Rel. Sanders v. DeRobertis
See, e.g., Brown v. Wisconsin State Department of Public Welfare, 457 F.2d 257, 259 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 862 , 93 S.Ct. 150 , 34 L.Ed.2d 108 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fred Anthony Frederickson
Compare Roy v. United States, 416 F.2d 874, 877-78 (9th Cir. 1969) (threatening statement is willful if a reasonable person should foresee that the hearers would take the statement seriously), and United States v. Hart, 457 F.2d 1087, 1090-91 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 861 , 93 S.Ct. 150 , 34 L.Ed.2d 108 (1972) (same), with United States v. Patilio, 431 F.2d 293 (4th Cir. 1970), panel opinion adhered to, 438 F.2d *1363 13 (4th Cir. 1971) (en banc) (threat against President violates statute only if speaker either possesses actual intention to carry it out or communicates it in a manner…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Costanza
v.
New Jersey
v.
New Jersey
No. 71-6681.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1972.
Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (2)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.