green
Positive treatment
4.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Jascalevich
Thus, while Justice White in Branzburg eschewed a balancing test to determine whether there was a privilege to refuse to disclose information .( 408 U. S. at 701-706 , 93 S. Ct. at 3666-3669, 33 L.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Norflett
Ed. 2d 201 were confined to the condition: inter alia, that the abortion, if performed, be based on an appropriately safeguarded medical judgment. [410 U. S. at 991, 93 S. Ct. 1516 ]. 14 Only two of the defendants appealed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Silverman v. Berkson
(2×)
See In re Bridge, 120 N.J.Super. 460, 468-69 , 295 A.2d 3 (App.Div.) (discussing civil sanctions and confinement to secure compliance with order), certif. denied. 62 N.J. 80 , 299 A.2d 78 (1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 991 , 93 S.Ct. 1500 , 36 L.Ed.2d 189 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Mayron
(2×)
See Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 , 92 S.Ct. 2646 , 33 L.Ed.2d 626 (1972), and In re Bridge, 120 N.J.Super. 460 (App.Div.), certif. den., 62 N.J. 80 (1972), cert. den., 410 U.S. 991 , 93 S.Ct. 1500 , 36 L.Ed.2d 189 (1973) (both of which allowed a grand jury access to a reporter’s materials.) 7 In Bridge the court held that by disclosing the name of the source and part of the information conveyed by the source, the reporter had waived the privilege and could be compelled to testify before a Grand Jury about both the source’s identity and all information, whether published or not, that th…
discussed
Cited "see"
Haitian Refugee Center v. James S. Gracey, Admiral/commandant, United States Coast Guard
See Air Reduction Co. v. Hickel, 420 F.2d 592 (D.C.Cir.1969) 12 Viewing third party standing as implied by specific constitutional guarantees readily explains Cheaney v. Indiana, 410 U.S. 991 , 93 S.Ct. 1516 , 36 L.Ed.2d 189 (1973), a case summarily denying a nonphysician, convicted of performing an abortion, standing to assert his patent's rights.
cited
Cited "see"
Dixon v. Hopper
See Bassett v. Smith, 464 F.2d 347 (5th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 991 , 93 S.Ct. 1509 , 36 L.Ed.2d 190 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilkins v. State of Maryland
See United States v. Guzman, 468 F.2d 1245, 1247-48 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 937 , 93 S.Ct. 1397 , 35 L.Ed.2d 602 (1973), aff’g, 337 F.Supp. 140, 143 (S.D.N.Y.1972). “[J]ury pools are not required to be a mirror image of the community.” United States v. Ross, 468 F.2d 1213, 1217 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 989 , 93 S.Ct. 1500 , 36 L.Ed.2d 188 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hammond v. Bostic
See United States v. *734 Robinson, 153 U.S.App.D.C. 114, 471 F.2d 1082 (1972), cert. granted, 410 U.S. 982 , 93 S.Ct. 1500 , 36 L.Ed.2d 177 (1973), where Judge Wright extensively reviews the subject.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hayes v. A.J. Associates, Inc.
See Thompson v. Burk, 2 Alaska 249 (D.Alaska 1904) (Burk, knowing of Thompson’s prior claim, staked same property without Thompson's knowledge and later discovered valuable minerals thereon while on the land under a contract with Thompson to prospect it for Thompson); Fisher v. Seymour, 23 Colo. 542 , 49 P. 30 (1897) (Seymour, while acting as agent to sell claims for Fisher, arranged to have valuable portion of claim patented to himself and others by what court called “gross fraud”); Bagg v. New Jersey Loan Co., 88 Ariz. 182 , 354 P.2d 40 (1960) (Bagg, while employed to supervise mining …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James Barber v. James Ponte
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Ross, 468 F.2d 1213, 1217 (9th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 989 , 93 S.Ct. 1500 , 36 L.Ed.2d 188 (1973); United States v. Guzman, 337 F.Supp. 140, 143 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 468 F.2d 1245 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 937 , 93 S.Ct. 1397 , 35 L.Ed.2d 602 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael August Polizzi
See also United States v. Ross, 468 F.2d 1213 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 989 , 93 S.Ct. 1500 , 36 L.Ed.2d 188 (1973) ; United States v. Gast, 457 F.2d 141 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 969 , 92 S.Ct. 2426 , 32 L.Ed.2d 668 (1972) ; United States v. Guzman, 337 F.Supp. 140 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 468 F.2d 1245 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 937 , 93 S.Ct. 1397 , 35 L.Ed.2d 602 (1973) ; United States v. Arnett, 342 F.Supp. 1255 (D.Mass.1970).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bridge
v.
New Jersey
v.
New Jersey
No. 72-923.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 19, 1973.
Certiorari, Ground, Mootness.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Super. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas would deny certiorari on ground of mootness.