green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Harnett v. Ryan Homes, Inc.
See note 15 infra 9 360 F.Supp. at 889 10 458 F.2d 255 , 269 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 814 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972) 11 340 F.2d 457 , 462 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965) Edward Ryan and Ryan Homes do not squarely meet Harnett's arguments that the district court's finding regarding the insubstantial nature of Edward Ryan's thoughts was erroneous and that the district court's conclusion that the omission was not material was incorrect.
discussed
Cited "see"
Harnett v. Ryan Homes, Inc.
See note 15 infra. . 360 F.Supp. at 889 . . 458 F.2d 255 , 269 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 814 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972). . 340 F.2d 457 , 462 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Rifle Association v. Commissioner, Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement
See, e.g., United States v. Duncan, 456 F.2d 1401 , 1404–05 (9th Cir.) (hold- ing the Twenty-Sixth Amendment did not make federal law setting the mini- mum age for jury service at twenty-one unconstitutional), vacated on other grounds, 409 U.S. 814 (1972); United States v. Guzman, 468 F.2d 1245, 1248 (2d Cir. 1972) (same); United States v. Shaver, 506 F.2d 699, 701 (4th Cir. 1974) (re- jecting the argument that Congress “impliedly . . . redefined the term ‘minor- ity’” through the Twenty-Sixth Amendment).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Murgia v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Bd. of Retire.
See also, e. g., United States v. Duncan, 9 Cir., 1972, 456 F.2d 1401, 1405 (minimum age for jury service), vacated on other grounds, 409 U.S. 814 , 93 S.Ct. 161 , 34 L.Ed.2d 72 ; Smith v. United States, 9 Cir., 1970, 424 F.2d 267 (selective service age limitations); Scarangella v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 3 Cir., 1969, 418 F.2d 228 (classification of tax exemptions by age of dependent).
Butcher
v.
Township of Grosse Ile
v.
Township of Grosse Ile
No. 72-92.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1972.
Appeal, Properly, Question, Want.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Mich, dismissed for want of substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Stewart would dismiss appeal for want of a properly-presented federal question.